Teaching JavaScript: The Ultimate Humanitarian Crisis

Content C DateTime. ToStringO PHP DateTime:formato JavaScript Date. tolSOStringO splitTiol

The absolute TRAGEDY of being a JavaScript developer confronted with explaining Promises! 💀 When cornered and asked to explain how asynchronous operations actually work, even the bravest JS dev would rather face a firing squad than attempt to articulate callback hell, .then() chains, and the mystical async/await sorcery. "Don't shoot! I am JS Developer" quickly transforms to "Actually... just end me now" when faced with explaining the cosmic horror that is JavaScript's Promise architecture. The surrender is REAL.

Ah, the classic StackOverflow NaN test debate! Someone wrote a beautifully elegant isNaN() function that simply checks if a number isn't equal to itself ( num != num ), which is actually brilliant because that's the only time equality fails in JavaScript/Python. But then some principled developer comes along and declares it "prohibited witchcraft" despite admitting it works perfectly. This is coding purity culture at its finest. "Yes, your three-line solution works flawlessly, but I'm morally obligated to insist you use the official 50-line implementation with seventeen edge cases instead." The real witchcraft is how StackOverflow manages to turn elegant solutions into religious debates since 2009.

JavaScript developers evolving their Promise syntax like it's Pokémon. First there was .convertToPromise() which nobody remembers using. Then came .makePromise() , the awkward teenage phase. But .promisify() ? That's the good stuff that makes developers bare their teeth in that special "I finally found the right utility function after 3 hours of Stack Overflow" grin.

Content peter TheZodiacKisser 2h Replying to elonmusk hi elon, as a side hobby to keep my mind sharp and hustle strong i like to write daily coding challenges. today i tried to rewrite twitter's front end engagement display (React JS using flex boxes). Can you please review my code and let me know what you think?

Boolean questions should return TRUE or FALSE. That's it. No debate. No explanation. Just binary logic. But then there's that one colleague who responds with "Well, it depends..." and proceeds to write a novel-length string response that could've been a simple yes/no. The worst part? You're still parsing their answer three coffee refills later, trying to figure out if they meant true or false. It's like asking "Is this variable null?" and getting back the entire Git commit history since 2015.