Recursive Meme Preference

The internet's most awkward puberty timeline exposed! First, HTML spent 4 years strutting around naked with no CSS to dress it up. Then JavaScript arrived a year later, but apparently HTML still needed 3 more years to develop a brain. This perfectly captures the chaotic evolution of web development—a naked, brainless markup language somehow became the foundation of everything we build today. No wonder our websites are dysfunctional; they were raised by a parent who spent its formative years without clothes or cognitive function.

Beginner coder: *frantically grabs at every language pill like a desperate llama* Rust evangelists: *sinister grin* "Yes, come to the dark side where memory is safe but your sanity isn't." The coding journey in one image - start by panic-collecting JavaScript, Python, and whatever framework is trending on Twitter this week. End up with the smug satisfaction of a Rust developer who'll tell you about zero-cost abstractions while you're just trying to order coffee.

Content Follow Princioa Consultant Software Architect Team Leader S 30 a Forens S What Are the Greenest Programming Languages: This paper presents a study of the runtime, memory usage, and energy consumotion of twentvseven welcknown sottware lanGuages. We monitor the perormance or such languages using ten cnnerencorograminino problems, expressed in each of the languages. Our results show interesting findings, such as slower faster languages consuming less more energy, and now memo usage marlences enero consumotion. we show now to use ou results to provide software engineers support to decide which language to use when energy efficiency is a concern This study implemented 10 benchmark problems in 27 different programming languages and measure execution time, energy consumption, and peak memo use C is the most efficient programming language, while Python and Perl are the least environmental friendly programming languages Link: https:Inkd.indnyrcdGd engineers programming sottware language energy sustainabilty (c) C (c) Rust (c) C (c) Ada (v) Java (c) Pascal (c) Chapel (v) Lisp (c) Ocaml (c) Fortran (c) Swift (c) Haskell (v) C (c) Go (G) Dart (v) F (i) JavaScript (v) Racket (i) TypeScript (i Hack (i) PHP (y) Erlang (i) Lua (i) Jruby (a) Ruby (i) Python ( Perl Energy 1.00 1.03 1.34 1.70 1.98 2.14 2.18 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.79 3.10 3.14 3.23 3.83 4.13 4.45 7.91 21.50 24.02 29.30 42.23 45.98 46.54 69.91 75.88 79.58 C0 Venkatesh Madi and 4.999 others 397 comments

When you realize that actual spiders are the only creatures on the planet who get excited to find bugs in their web... while the rest of us frontend devs are having existential crises over that one pixel misalignment in Safari. The irony is painful. Nature's web developers have their priorities straight—they literally HUNT for bugs while we hide from them. Next sprint planning I'm just going to say "Sorry, can't fix that bug, I'm not biologically programmed like a spider."

Behold, the Tower of Babel approach to software development! You spend weeks meticulously stacking your project like some architectural masterpiece, only for the universe to whisper: "That random library your entire foundation depends on? Yeah, it's getting deprecated tomorrow." It's like building a house of cards on top of someone else's house of cards, and they've just decided to take up competitive sneezing. The higher your tower of dependencies grows, the more spectacular the inevitable collapse. And yet we keep building taller, don't we?

Content PHP next js react devs