Github Copilot Is Wild

The programmer's brain is truly a special place. While normal people are saying "don't treat women like objects," our code-addled minds are literally instantiating new Woman objects with a constructor. That syntax is straight from the OOP playbook—creating a new instance with the classic women = new Women(); pattern. It's that beautiful moment when your professional deformation makes you physically unable to interpret anything outside of programming paradigms. Your brain has been permanently rewired to see the world as classes, objects, and inheritance hierarchies.

The ultimate hipster programmer manifesto has arrived! At the top, we have the "Reject modernity" squad featuring React, Tailwind, Vue, some hipster hamster, and TypeScript—basically everything recruiters won't stop messaging you about on LinkedIn. Meanwhile, the "Embrace tradition" crew is just chilling below with HTML, CSS, JavaScript, PHP, and Python—you know, the technologies that actually keep the internet from imploding. It's like choosing between a complicated pour-over coffee ritual versus just drinking the office coffee that somehow still works. Sure, the modern frameworks look impressive on your resume, but when the apocalypse comes, who do you think will still be able to make a website work? The person who can write vanilla JS or the one who needs 37 dependencies just to center a div?

The ABSOLUTE BETRAYAL of JavaScript's type coercion in its full, horrifying glory! 😱 First panel: Blue stick figure PROUDLY declares JavaScript as their favorite language while White stick figure watches in silent judgment. Second panel: The SHOCKING truth is revealed! JavaScript's string concatenation turns "11" + 1 into "111" (because OBVIOUSLY adding a number to a string makes a longer string 🙄), but "11" - 1 becomes 10 (because subtraction magically transforms strings into numbers). White stick figure is DEVASTATED. Blue stick figure is MORTIFIED. And that little dinosaur in the corner? He's just living his best life, completely unbothered by our existential programming crisis. The AUDACITY!

Someone tried to create a radio button UI in real life but completely missed the point. Radio buttons are supposed to be mutually exclusive—you can only select one option. But they forgot to actually implement the selection functionality! It's like shipping code without the onClick handler. This is what happens when product managers say "make it look exactly like the mockup" without understanding the underlying functionality.

The real street magic here is using Unicode character references as object keys to confuse even "super senior JS developers." That code is pure evil - using those weird \u escape sequences to access object properties, then doing some arithmetic with them. The magician knew exactly what he was doing. Nothing makes frontend devs question their life choices faster than JavaScript's object property access quirks combined with Unicode escape sequences. And they fell right into his trap, going from "we can solve any expression" to "OMG" in 0.2 seconds flat. Classic JavaScript humiliation in the wild.

Content LOVE TYPESCRIPT OKAY, NAME ANY TYPE ANY ingflip.com That's on me, I set the bar too low.