Full Stack Devs

Content Interviewer: gives a hard algorithmic problem Me: solves it using library functions Interviewer: Well yes, outstan but it's illegal.

The classic regex lifecycle in three simple steps: start with one problem, apply regex thinking it's the solution, end up with two problems. And yes, the plural of regex is absolutely "regrets" – a truth universally acknowledged by anyone who's ever tried to debug a pattern that worked perfectly in the testing tool but somehow fails spectacularly in production. It's like watching someone reach for regex to parse HTML. You want to stop them, but it's already too late. Their soul now belongs to the matching group demons.

Content brandon v burcs Me to my github build checks: Luthoo mbutyaka typescript if i make a mistake in English please don't correct me i have no respect for this language

Content Name a more ionic duo, I'll wait. Microsoft Visual Studio There were build errors. Would you like to continue and run the last successful build? X Start Yes Do not show this dialog again

Content I thought he was a AIML Engineer "How to write an AI Blockchain with ML using ReactS and CSS" 9 "React hooks not working", "Float left is shifting all divs to the left instead of required one". ProarammerHumor.io

When CSS gets mildly annoying, my brain immediately abandons all logic and jumps straight to flexbox – that magical layout tool we barely understand but desperately hope will fix everything. It's the developer equivalent of hitting your TV when it stops working. The lizard brain takes over, and suddenly we're throwing display: flex at problems that don't even need it. "My button is 2px off? FLEXBOX. Text not centered? FLEXBOX. Computer on fire? You better believe that's a flexbox."