Frontend Developer

JavaScript throwing shade at Python's type system is peak language rivalry. Python's like "I'll just figure out the types at runtime, no biggie" while JavaScript—the king of undefined is not a function —has the audacity to mock someone else's type safety. Meanwhile, both languages are out here turning perfectly good integers into strings when you least expect it. The irony of JavaScript bragging about "dynamic typing" while silently casting everything is chef's kiss material. It's like watching two drunks argue about who's more sober.

Content X 0 y 0 5 6 7 while True: X 1 y 1 9 10 11 12 PROBLEMS if x is y: print (f"x: equal!") else: print (f" (x: Not equal!") break OUTPUT DEBUG CONSOLE TERMINAL POr 254: equal! 255: equal! 256: equal! 257: Not equal!

Content IF THE WORLD WAS CREATED BY A PROGRAMMER In THE BEGINNINg, THERE WAS THE HEavEN AND THE EArTH BUT THE EARTH WAS FORMLESS AND BUGGY, WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION BY toggl AND THE PROGRAMMER SAW THAT IT WAS NoT GOOD. THEN YOU SAID "LET ThErE BE LIGHT! BUT THE LIGHT Did NOT COMPILE. On THE SECOND DAY YOU MERGE WATER YOU CREATE A HACK SO THAT LIGHT IS PART OF THE LAND TO CREATE DARKNESS, YoU NEED TO HIDE THE LAND, BUT THAT'S OK CAUSE CREATURES WONT BE ADDED UNTIL LATER. AND STACKOVERFLOW SAID IT'S FINE MAINES BUT BECAUSE OF THE DEPENDENCY, LIGHT BREAKS AS IS ACCIDENTALL LAND FLOODED YOU CHECK STACKOVERFLOW (IN THE DARKNESS IT's THE ThiRD DAY. YOU TRY TO ADD CREATURES YOU ADD THEM IN THE TURNS OUT THE CREATURES IN THE DARKNESS, BUT BROWSER USING COOKIES, THERE'S NO LAND WITHOUT WHICH UNFORTUNATELY NEEDED TO BE ADDED SOONER MAKES THEM MORTAL BUt The CLIent FORGOT To LIGHT, AND YOU CAN'T HAVE LIGHT BECAUSE OF THE MENTION THAT WATER. IT'S THE FOURTH DAY. YOU DECIDE TO USE C TO CREATE A BALLOON YOU ALSO USE STL TURNS OUT THE ISSUES FOR ABSTRACTIONS AND THaT INFLATES THE EARTH IT WORKS OUT GREAT WERE CAUSED BY THE WITH FLAT EARTH DESIGN COMPLICATIONS WHATSOEVER! IT'S ThE FIFtH DaY YOU START ADDING PEOPLE TO HELP You. ON THe SIXTH DAY YoU LOOk AT THE CHAOS YOU CREATED DANGLING YOU DECIDE TO CREATE THEM IN YOUR LIKENESS, WHICH IS A MISTAKE REACT REACT THEY IMMEDIATELY POPULATE THE EARTH WITH HACKS, FADS AND UNNECESSARY JAVASCRIPT LIBRARIES (FUCKIT.JS' QUERY YOU ATTEMPT TO LEAD PEOPLE BACK TO SENSIBLE PROGRAMMING, BUT IT IS TOO LATE- EVERYTHING RUNS ON DEPENDENCIES DAYTIMEAIR.JS HORIZON SEA.JS REALISTIC.WAVES.JS BETTERBANKS.J. BASE.JS ON THE SEVENTH DAY YoU REALLY WANT TO REST, BUT YOU NEED TO ORGANISE ALL You've CREATE GO TOGGL.COM

Content jestion g Which of the following are flu symptoms, but NOT cold sumptoms? a) Cough b) Fatigue and body aches c) Sore throat d) Band o e) All of the above ProdrammerHumor.io

OMFG, the functional programming zealots and political anarchists have formed an UNHOLY ALLIANCE! Both screaming "NO CLASS, NO STATE" but for ENTIRELY different reasons! 😱 Functional programmers are over here having existential meltdowns if a function dares to remember ANYTHING between calls, while anarchists are plotting the downfall of government structures. The fact they found common ground in this epic handshake is the most chaotic crossover since pineapple met pizza! Pure functions or pure chaos—either way, someone's world order is getting DESTROYED! 💥

Content Is it time to bring CARS and GUNS into JavaScript? JavaScript has gone from a cute little scripting language to an unstoppable behemoth. But is it doing enough to attract the male audience? The marketing materials out there are all targeting women. Look at React's cute and curvy logo or Vue's pastel colors. And don't even get me started on Github's "octopus cat" logo. Clearly, something needs to be done to attract men. And what do men love? Cars and guns. But first, let's take a step back. Are men really better programmers? To put it bluntly, yes. There's a lot of debate on this topic, but the scientific evidence is