Tech Workers

Computer scientists: "Let's discuss if this system can solve any computable problem!" Me, a practical developer: "Cool theory bro, but can it run Doom?" The "Can it run Doom?" test has become the unofficial benchmark for computing devices since the 90s. Forget your fancy theoretical computer science - if your toaster, calculator, or pregnancy test can run a demon-slaying game from 1993, that's when you've truly made it in tech.

Ah, the classic GPU model number trap. When your "upgrade" from a GTX 1080 Ti to an RTX 5060 gives you a 5× performance boost... or does it? Someone clearly forgot that Nvidia's marketing department is playing 4D chess with these model numbers. The 1080 in the chart is just the model number, not the performance score, while 5060 is the actual benchmark. It's like comparing apples to... well, model numbers of apples. This is why senior devs trust benchmarks, not fancy digits in product names.

Every sysadmin knows this feeling. Your manager thinks you're busy testing that fancy new Cisco router while you're actually sneaking glances at the ticket queue that's been on fire since 2019. The shiny new toys always get the budget approval, but somehow fixing the actual production issues that cause your phone to blow up at 3 AM is considered "maintenance" and "not a priority." Classic management move to think you're living your best network engineer life when you're actually just trying to keep the digital duct tape from peeling off.

OH MY GOD, the ABSOLUTE STATE of game development in 2035! 😂 Two game devs practically LOSING THEIR MINDS with hysterical laughter over the most REVOLUTIONARY concept ever - a game that can run on a WHOPPING 24GB of VRAM! Meanwhile, current AAA games are already devouring our graphics cards like they're at an all-you-can-eat VRAM buffet! At this rate, by 2035 we'll need small nuclear reactors just to run the title screen of GTA 7! The optimization apocalypse is upon us, people!

Normal people buy cars. Rich people buy luxury cars and helicopters. But programmers? We spend our six-figure salaries on colorful mechanical keyboards that sound like a typewriter orchestra and cost more than some people's monthly rent. The irony is that we'll debate for weeks over which $300 keyboard has the perfect tactile feedback, then write the same garbage code we would've written on a $10 keyboard from Walmart. But hey, at least our fingers feel fancy while creating those runtime errors.

Ah, the classic tech enthusiast's dilemma. Dropping four grand on Apple's spatial computing headset and now you're just a sad guy in goggles trying to convince yourself (and your ex-wife) that virtual spreadsheets in your living room were worth the price of a decent used car. The divorce papers probably just read "Creative differences - specifically his belief that 'it's an investment in the future.'" The rest of us are just waiting for version 3 when it actually becomes useful and costs half as much.