Karma Farming On Github

The evolution of our code is like Noah's bizarre coding ark. At the top, we've got the majestic StackOverflow elephant carrying us through deadlines, the documentation rabbit that nobody reads, GitHub's bear-minimum code contributions, the professor's penguin-perfect examples that never work in real life, your friend's crocodile code (dangerous but sometimes useful), and your actual code... just lying there, barely alive. Then suddenly—a miracle! That unholy chimera of copy-pasted snippets, caffeine-fueled 3AM hacks, and pure desperation somehow WORKS. The client stares at your Frankenstein's monster of code with the same bewilderment you have. Nobody knows how or why it runs, but it does, and we're all too afraid to refactor it.

Trying to delete a branch with git branch -d only to get that passive-aggressive "not fully merged" error is like Git saying "I'm protecting you from yourself." So what do we do? Yell at Git and use the capital -D flag because WE'RE THE BOSS HERE. Git's safety mechanisms are cute until you've spent 8 hours debugging merge conflicts and just want that feature branch gone from your life forever.

OH. MY. GOD. When your bathroom decor becomes a PERSONAL ATTACK! 💀 Those mosaic tiles are LITERALLY a GitHub contribution graph showing the tragic demise of your coding productivity! Dense clusters of activity at the beginning, then gradually fading into sad, empty white spaces of shame. Even your BATHROOM is judging your commitment issues! The universe is basically screaming "maybe if you spent less time on the toilet and more time coding, your contribution graph wouldn't look like a digital ghost town!" I can't even shower in peace without being reminded of my professional failures!

Ah, the classic one-person development team. James Pearce here is playing 4D chess with version control - creating the PR, assigning himself as the reviewer, approving his own work, and then merging it. Who needs code reviews when you're both judge and jury? This is basically the corporate equivalent of marking your own homework, except somehow it's completely acceptable in certain "agile" environments. The circle of trust is just... a dot.

Spent 3 weeks crafting pristine code with perfect test coverage and documentation that would make Clean Code's author weep tears of joy... only for the junior dev to refactor it into an eldritch horror during their first week. The calm smile while everything burns? That's the acceptance phase of grief after seeing your git blame light up with someone else's name. The real tragedy? No code review process could have prevented this massacre.

When your PR shows "-9,953" lines of code and your manager gives you a thumbs up. Nothing says "senior developer" like knowing what code not to write. The most efficient code is the code that doesn't exist. Somewhere a project manager is frantically updating their burndown chart while wondering how to report "negative progress" to stakeholders.