Karma Farming On Github

Ah, the classic "fresh start" delusion. Developer sees their old project infested with bugs (those cute green gremlins), and thinks starting a new project will somehow magically solve everything. Then proceeds to literally copy-paste chunks of the old code—bugs and all—into the new project. The box even says "THIS SIDE UP" upside down because reading documentation was never our strong suit. Ten years of experience has taught me that no matter how clean the new repo looks, those bugs are just waiting for their chance to emerge... usually right before a demo to the client.

The eternal battle between Microsoft's desperate pleas and Linux users' defiant independence is perfectly captured here. Microsoft is literally begging you not to download Chrome while simultaneously pushing Edge down your throat like an overeager parent with vegetables. Meanwhile, Linux users are treating Microsoft like an annoying insect - cracking their command-line whips and shooing away anything that doesn't respect their freedom to choose. The imagery of commanding Git with a bullwhip is just *chef's kiss* - because nothing says "I'm in control of my computing destiny" like manually compiling your kernel while laughing maniacally.

The DRAMATIC DIFFERENCE between hearing "you're absolutely right" the first time versus the 985th time during code reviews! 😭 That top panel is the PURE JOY of your first accepted pull request - you're practically FLOATING on cloud nine! But that bottom panel? That's the soul-crushing deadness in your eyes after submitting your 985th fix and your senior dev STILL manages to find something wrong. "You're absolutely right!" you say through gritted teeth while secretly plotting to "accidentally" delete the entire codebase. The emotional journey from eager puppy to dead-inside zombie is just *chef's kiss* relatable.

The classic trolley problem asks if you'd divert a trolley to kill one person instead of five. But why choose when you can just git rebase master ? The command magically rearranges history, making it look like the trolley was always on a different track. Sure, you might have obliterated a timeline and forced-pushed reality, but hey—the commit history looks clean! Just don't mention the merge conflicts that briefly tore apart the fabric of space-time.

Social etiquette has rules: don't ask women their age or men their salary. But the REAL taboo? Asking developers to explain their commit messages. "Fixed stuff" could mean anything from a minor CSS tweak to preventing the entire codebase from imploding. "Minor changes" might have rewritten the authentication system. And that cryptic "WIP" from 2019? It's now load-bearing code nobody dares to touch. The commit history is less documentation and more of a psychological thriller where "refactoring" is code for "I broke everything and fixed it before anyone noticed."

Oh. My. GOD. The circle of software development life in its purest form! 💀 First, the ACTUAL ENGINEER creates something and proudly announces it. Then some random person with a fancy logo head has the AUDACITY to question if they really made it?! But wait! The plot thickens! The fancy-logo-head STEALS the creation, turns around, and claims it as their own! And then - THE BETRAYAL - the original engineer is now labeled a "VIBECODER" and gets the same treatment they gave others! The final panel is just *chef's kiss* - our newly minted VIBECODER standing there, pathetically claiming credit for something they actually DID make, but nobody believes them anymore. It's the software development karma police coming full circle!