It Scares Me: Git Rebase Edition

The sacred order of debugging has been disturbed. For eons, the ancient pact dictated that StackOverflow shall appear first in search results, offering salvation with copy-pastable solutions. Now GitHub shows up first, forcing you to actually read code and understand what's happening. Truly the darkest timeline. Next thing you know, they'll expect us to write documentation.

Ah, the classic "we have food at home" meme but for developers! Kid wants professional CI/CD pipelines, mom says no because there's "CI/CD at home" - which turns out to be a janky collection of config files and shell scripts cobbled together by some poor soul who just wanted to automate deployments without learning Jenkins. It's the equivalent of calling a stick tied to a rock "advanced weaponry." That homemade CI/CD solution is one failed deployment away from bringing the entire production environment crashing down faster than a junior dev's confidence during their first code review.

The Indiana Jones of software development! Carefully eyeing that golden idol of "existing code" like it's a sacred relic, only to swap it with your "new commit" and trigger the boulder of doom—the linter. That moment when you think you've perfectly calculated the weight of your code replacement, but forgot about those pesky tabs vs spaces arguments. Now you're sprinting through the codebase with angry code reviewers throwing spears at your PR. Should've read the tribe's ancient documentation first!

The eternal developer insecurity captured in one GitHub diff stat. Adding nearly 5,000 lines while removing 1,144 and still wondering if your PR is substantial enough. Meanwhile, your code reviewer is silently praying you didn't just paste an entire npm package into the codebase. The green bars say "impressive contribution" but your brain says "what if it's mostly comments and whitespace?" Classic impostor syndrome with a side of version control anxiety.

That one developer who insists on hosting their own Git server instead of using established platforms... and suddenly you're exchanging keys, joining their Wireguard VPN, and probably signing blood oaths just to contribute to a project that could've lived happily on GitHub. The suspicious monkey face perfectly captures that moment when you're wondering if this is worth the effort or if your colleague is secretly building a bunker for the inevitable tech apocalypse.

When your branch is stable enough for production but senior devs won't give you merge permissions. Welcome to git politics, where your code's quality matters less than your job title. The irony of being told to fix merge conflicts when you're literally not allowed to merge. That commit hash at the bottom is probably longer than your career at this company.