Git Blame Me

The git diff shows Firefox removing their FAQ answer about not selling personal data. Nothing says "we value privacy" quite like deleting the promise not to sell it! Clearly Firefox decided the best way to compete with Chrome was to speedrun the "Either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain" challenge. That deletion is worth a thousand privacy policies. For those wondering, this is from Firefox's structured-data-firefox-faq.html file where they've removed the entire Q&A about not selling user data. The irony is palpable - they kept the "Why is Firefox so slow?" question though. At least they've got their priorities straight!

The duality of code reviews perfectly captured! On the left, you're the sweet innocent chihuahua in a pink sweater, smiling hopefully as you submit your code for review. "Please be gentle with my 3 AM spaghetti code masterpiece!" But when someone asks you to review their code? Suddenly you transform into the demon chihuahua on the right, teeth bared, ready to tear apart every unnecessary variable and poorly named function. "You called this function 'doStuff()'? I'm about to end your whole career." For the uninitiated, "LGTM" stands for "Looks Good To Me" - the four letters every developer dreams of seeing in their pull request... right before the reviewer adds "...except for these 47 issues I found."

When your mom accidentally becomes the harshest code reviewer in existence! Non-technical parents have this supernatural ability to cut through our complex developer egos with brutal simplicity. "Random English words in fancy colors" is basically what our syntax highlighting looks like to outsiders, and the alignment complaint? Pure gold. That's literally what senior devs nitpick about during code reviews! Mom's innate attention to detail would make her the terror of every GitHub pull request. She'd reject your meticulously crafted 3-hour algorithm because your variable names aren't descriptive enough.

Google knows what's up. Search for "proper way to commit after merge conflict" and it immediately suggests the Suicide Prevention Lifeline. That's not a bug—it's a feature! Nothing pushes a developer closer to the edge than spending three hours resolving merge conflicts only to have Git scream at you about some invisible whitespace issue. The algorithm has clearly been trained on the tears of developers who've had to manually merge 500 lines of conflicting code at 4:59pm on a Friday. Google's just saving time by cutting out the middle step between "git merge master" and existential despair.

The diagram perfectly captures the infinite loop of developer optimism. You start with a brilliant idea, immediately create a new GitHub repo, then excitedly tell everyone in Slack how you're "revolutionizing" something. Then... straight back to having another idea without ever writing a single line of actual code. It's the software development equivalent of buying gym equipment in January that becomes an expensive clothes hanger by February. The only thing missing is the 3am caffeine-fueled README.md that promises features you haven't even conceptualized yet.

Nothing says "we have no idea what we actually need" quite like a job posting that requires 4 years of experience with React 16+ when React 16 came out like 6 years ago. But sure, let me just pull out my time machine and get 5 years of experience with every technology that's existed for 3 years. They want a full-stack unicorn who's mastered Java EE, Spring, Angular, React, PHP, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Docker, AWS, and apparently has been using Git for 5 years like it's some kind of specialized skill. Brother, I've been using Git for 10 years and I still Google how to undo a commit. The real kicker? They probably want to pay you $75k for this "junior developer" position that requires the combined experience of an entire dev team. HR just copy-pasted every buzzword from the last decade into one listing and called it a day.