Nothing I Do Has Any Effect

The AUDACITY of code to exist in such a horrific state! Our poor protagonist goes from rage-reading someone else's spaghetti code to the DRAMATIC realization that it must be completely rewritten. After furiously planning, typing, and sweating through the keyboard, what does this coding martyr create? A CLONE of the original disaster but in a different color! The absolute PINNACLE of developer evolution - hating someone's code so passionately you rebuild the exact same monstrosity and then have the NERVE to feel smug about it. The final frame where they're gleefully planning to delete the original is just *chef's kiss* - as if the red machine wasn't literally BIRTHED from the same deranged logic. Honey, that's not refactoring, that's just putting lipstick on a digital pig!

GASP! The absolute AUDACITY of someone suggesting JavaScript users are just lazy TypeScript avoiders! 💅 The eternal holy war between "just let me write my code without 47 type declarations" and "excuse me sir, your variable might be a string OR a number and I simply cannot function without knowing which!" The JavaScript rebels living on the edge while TypeScript devotees clutch their strongly-typed pearls in horror. Meanwhile, that smug reply with the smiley face is just *chef's kiss* perfection - like proudly admitting you eat cereal with a fork because spoons are too much work!

Content OH BOY HERE IGO DEBUGGING AGAIN

When your boss says "we need to optimize our dependency management" but you misheard it as "Pepsi-dency management." The blue wall of shame is just one caffeine-fueled all-nighter away from becoming a Docker container fortress. At least when the servers crash, you'll have enough sugar and caffeine to keep you awake through the entire incident response. The real question is whether the RGB lighting is powered by Mountain Dew or tears of regret.

The eternal duality of programming: questioning everything when it fails AND when it succeeds. Nothing triggers existential dread quite like code working on the first try. "It's broken? Must debug for hours." "It works? Must have introduced 12 new bugs I haven't found yet." The only certainty in development is uncertainty—and the sneaking suspicion that your computer is gaslighting you.

Content As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, the Web Bluetooth API does not provide a built-in mechanism to automatically retrieve a list of all available services on a Bluetooth device. You typically need to know the UUIDs of the services you want to access in advance. However, if you're in a testing or debugging scenario and you want to discover all available services on a Bluetooth device, you can do so manually by iterating through all possible UUIDs. This is not a recommended approach for production use, but it can be useful for testing and exploration. Here's a JavaScript example of how you can iterate through a range of possible UUIDs to discover services on a Bluetooth device: javascript Copy code async function discoverAlIServices (device) ( const discoveredServices J; Generate a range of UUIDs to test (e.g., 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000 for (let i 0; i OxFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF; i) const wuid i.toString(16) .padStart (32, 'O'); try const service await device.gatt.getPrimaryService (uuid); discoveredServices.push (service); catch (error) I Service not found with this UUID, continue searching return discoveredServices; C Regenerate