Learning To Program In C

Ah, memory management... where C++ developers play Russian roulette with pointers while Rust programmers smugly watch from behind their compiler-enforced safety barriers. The "change my mind" format perfectly captures that stubborn C++ veteran who's spent 20 years mastering the dark arts of manual memory management and would rather die on that hill than admit Rust might have actually solved some problems. "I don't need safety features, I need SPEED!" they cry, while frantically debugging their 17th segmentation fault of the day.

Rust evangelists: *screeching intensifies* when they discover 19.11% of Rust libraries use the unsafe keyword, while C++ sits smugly at the dinner table knowing it doesn't need to mark anything as unsafe because everything is potentially unsafe by default. It's like bragging about having 19.11% of your codebase labeled "might explode" while C++ just assumes you're smart enough to know the whole thing is a minefield. Memory safety theater at its finest!

The C++ Committee gets a gold medal for creating the most complex language standard that somehow keeps getting more convoluted with each revision. Meanwhile, the guy celebrating with champagne and screaming at a simple "Hello World" print statement is the perfect representation of C++ developers who've spent 6 hours debugging template metaprogramming only to realize they forgot a semicolon. The bottom panel delivers the killing blow - while other programming languages stand proudly on their podiums, evolving gracefully and gaining adoption, C++ is over there chugging champagne and making a mess, still convinced it's the superior choice despite scaring away new developers faster than a segmentation fault at runtime. And yet... we'll still be wrestling with pointer arithmetic and undefined behavior in 2053. The language that refuses to die gracefully!

The secret ingredient to academic success: outsourcing your assembly code homework on Upwork for $30-40/hour! Someone's literally paying a contractor to join a Zoom call and explain their "graduate level assignment" while the code is already done. The beautiful irony of hiring someone to explain code you're supposed to understand yourself. Forget pulling all-nighters with obscure MOV instructions and stack pointers—just find someone to do your academic dirty work! Bonus points for the "No degree mentioned" tag, because apparently you don't need one to help others get theirs.

The evolution of programming weapons, perfectly illustrated. Assembler is your basic knife with a scope—minimal but precise. C is just a bullet with a hammer, because who needs safety features? C++ straps five different weapons together with duct tape and calls it "object-oriented." And then there's Python, which looks like it was designed by a committee of drunk engineers who couldn't decide what they wanted, so they included everything. "Yes, it's inefficient and ridiculous looking, but look how fast I can deploy it!"

The classic tale of preprocessor pain! Our poor green frog friend discovers the horrors of working with a client who doesn't understand the critical difference between #pragma once and #ifndef header guards. The dev goes through the proper steps: asking about header guard preferences, explaining duplication errors with a detailed diagram (like the absolute C++ nerd they are), only to discover the client was clueless the whole time. The punchline? "It's pragma once" - meaning the client picked a solution without understanding the problem. This is the programming equivalent of explaining quantum physics to someone who then says "atoms are small, got it!"