The Only Language I Speak Is AAAAAAAA

Functional programming: where simple loops become philosophical dissertations on category theory. The cult that promised elegance but delivered AbstractWidgetLocalizerManagerFactoryBean instead. You know you've reached peak programming enlightenment when asking for a simple function requires a PhD in mathematics and the ability to understand what a monad actually is (spoiler: nobody knows, they just pretend). The functional purists have been making us write fold and curry functions for years while secretly laughing at how we've traded straightforward code for the privilege of feeling superior at meetups. And we fell for it. Hook, line, and higher-order function.

Behold, the elevator panel that perfectly captures what happens when you ask AI to sort a list! The floors are in complete lexicographical order instead of numerical order because, well, that's technically sorting. Just like when you ask ChatGPT to organize your music and it puts "10 Things I Hate About You" soundtrack before "2Pac" because string comparison doesn't understand numbers. The AI followed instructions perfectly... and completely missed the point. Somewhere, a programmer is screaming about how they should have used parseInt() or a natural sort algorithm instead of letting the intern train the model on Stack Overflow answers.

Ah, the infinite loop of laziness masquerading as efficiency. Two functions locked in an eternal codependency, each refusing to do its own work. isEven() just passes the buck to isOdd() with a +1 twist, while isOdd() returns the favor by calling isEven() with the same trick. Neither function actually checks anything – they just play hot potato until the stack overflows and the whole program collapses like my will to review pull requests on Friday afternoons.

The classic learning curve of doom! Newbie programmers staring up at the programming staircase of despair where even the first step (Hello World) looks like Mount Everest. Meanwhile, they're already Googling "how to build Skynet with no programming experience" and wondering why their neural networks aren't sentient yet. The irony is that most tutorials literally start with printing "Hello World" to the console, but somehow folks want to skip straight to building the next ChatGPT without understanding variables. It's like trying to compose a symphony when you can't even play "Hot Cross Buns" on the recorder.

SWEET MOTHER OF COMPUTATIONAL DISASTERS! This poor soul is out here creating algorithms with O(n^n) complexity and has the AUDACITY to blame it on technology limitations?! 💀 For the blissfully unaware: O(n^n) is basically the algorithmic equivalent of trying to empty the ocean with a teaspoon. It's SO HORRIFICALLY INEFFICIENT that computer scientists don't even bother including it in most complexity charts because they're too busy having nervous breakdowns just thinking about it. No honey, you're not "limited by the technology of your time" - you're limited by your catastrophic life choices in algorithm design! Even a quantum computer from the year 3000 would burst into flames trying to run that monstrosity!

Oh. My. GOD. The eternal struggle of every data scientist who's ever been handed a Word document and told to "just extract the data" from it! 💀 The bell curve of intelligence is BRUTALLY accurate here. The average schmucks (34% on each side) are blissfully declaring "Word files can't be read by a machine" while the absolute geniuses at both extremes (0.1%!) know the dark arts of table parsing. Meanwhile, every data engineer is in the corner having a nervous breakdown because Karen from marketing just sent over CRITICAL BUSINESS DATA as a beautifully formatted Word table with merged cells. THE HORROR!