Reddit Sort: The World's Least Efficient Algorithm

Python starts out all friendly and approachable, luring you in with its simple syntax and beginner-friendly reputation. "Look at me, I'm so easy to learn!" it says with that innocent dinosaur face. Then suddenly you're drowning in machine learning libraries, matrix math, and data mining frameworks that make calculus look like kindergarten finger painting. The learning curve isn't a curve at all—it's a vertical wall with spikes at the top. One day you're printing "Hello World," the next you're implementing neural networks while questioning your life choices.

Computer scientists: "Let's discuss if this system can solve any computable problem!" Me, a practical developer: "Cool theory bro, but can it run Doom?" The "Can it run Doom?" test has become the unofficial benchmark for computing devices since the 90s. Forget your fancy theoretical computer science - if your toaster, calculator, or pregnancy test can run a demon-slaying game from 1993, that's when you've truly made it in tech.

OH MY GOSH! This is the ultimate programmer's double meaning! 😂 These folks are wearing "I ❤️ DP" shirts thinking they're showing love for Dolly Parton, but in the coding world, DP stands for Dynamic Programming - that algorithm technique where you break problems into subproblems and store the results to avoid recalculating them! It's like accidentally telling everyone you're obsessed with Fibonacci sequences and memoization when you just wanted to show your country music appreciation! The absolute CHAOS of context switching between fandoms! 🤣 This is what happens when you let programmers out in public without code reviews!

Ah yes, the prehistoric era of computing. Before 1956, programmers were just cavemen banging on two keys: 0 and 1. Need to compile your code? Just smash ENTER. Need a variable? That's what SPACE is for. Who needs fancy high-level languages when you can communicate directly with the machine using only existential dread and finger calluses? The most efficient debugging technique was just repeatedly hitting your head on the keyboard until something worked.

Ah, the elegant art of being simultaneously clever and ridiculous. This Python function is the programming equivalent of using a sledgehammer to kill a fly—with style. Instead of the boring old num % 2 == 0 check that peasant programmers use, this galaxy-brain developer created a string "eovdden" and indexes into it using num % 2 as the position, followed by another 2 (which does absolutely nothing). The string is cleverly arranged so position 0 gives "even" and position 1 gives "odd" — making this the most unnecessarily complex even/odd checker in existence. It's like building a Rube Goldberg machine when a light switch would do. And those sunglasses emojis? They know exactly what they've done. Pure chaotic evil masquerading as code.

When someone asks if you're a "full stack" developer and you show them your scientific computing code with nested loops six levels deep. That's not what "full stack" means, but hey, the stack trace when this bad boy crashes will definitely be full! Those nested do loops are giving me anxiety just looking at them. The complexity is through the roof with all those orbital mesh calculations. Who needs clean architecture when you can just nest another loop and call it a day? The person who has to maintain this monstrosity is probably updating their resume right now.