Marge Sort: Divide And Conquer

Mathematicians lose their minds when you suggest "≠" and "!=" are the same thing. Meanwhile, programmers are just happy their code compiles with either "!=" or "==". The assignment vs. equality operator debate has caused more silent rage than any merge conflict in history. Somewhere right now, a CS student is using "=" instead of "==" and wondering why their if-statement always evaluates to true.

Oh honey, you think you're a coding genius with your regex masterpiece? PLEASE! You've just created the programming equivalent of ancient hieroglyphics that even archaeologists would give up on! 💅 That beautiful Martin Fowler quote is SCREAMING at all you regex wizards who craft these incomprehensible one-liners that make future developers contemplate career changes. Sure, your computer understands it. Your colleagues? They're quietly plotting your demise while drowning in regex documentation.

Ah, the classic "explaining graphics programming to someone who just wanted to know what you do for a living." Guy's deep in the weeds about shadow mapping and depth buffers while she's probably wondering if she can escape to the bathroom. The thousand-yard stare of the man in front is all of us who've overheard a developer monologuing about technical minutiae at a social event. Pro tip: save the rendering pipeline discussions for the second date.

OH. MY. GOD. Someone actually wrote a function that loops through EVERY NUMBER from 0 to x just to check if a number is even or odd?! 💀 Instead of using the BASIC MODULO OPERATOR that exists in LITERALLY EVERY PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE, this psychopath decided "you know what would be fun? Let's make the computer count to potentially INFINITY and then return True if i equals 1 or 2!" The absolute AUDACITY to write if i == 1: return True for even numbers and if i == 2: return True for odd numbers has me SCREAMING into my mechanical keyboard! This is what happens when you code at 4am after your fifth energy drink!

This is basically the "Fox, Chicken, and Grain" logic puzzle repackaged as the ultimate management nightmare. Except instead of preventing your chicken from being eaten, you're preventing your team from murdering each other. The solution? Move the bore first, then the idiot, then bring the bore back, then move the asshole, and finally move the bore again. Though the real power move would be to just quit and find a company with functioning HR. And they say technical interviews are unrealistic...

Ah yes, the classic "let me solve this simple problem with the most unnecessarily complex solution possible" approach. Two mutually recursive functions to check if a number is even or odd? This has ChatGPT's fingerprints all over it. Meanwhile, every developer with more than 3 brain cells is screaming: return (n % 2 == 0); and calling it a day. This is what happens when you ask AI to "make it elegant" or "optimize this function." You get code that looks impressive in a technical interview but would get you publicly shamed in a code review.