Just A Joke

The robot overlord declares AI will replace programmers if it gets "clear customer needs and detailed specs" while below, a product manager sits calmly stating "the customer want a button that does stuff." Plot twist: programmers' job security isn't threatened by AI but protected by the eternal vagueness of requirements. The mythical "detailed spec" is rarer than a bug-free first commit. Even quantum computers couldn't parse "make it pop" or "just like Amazon but better."

The telltale signs of AI assistance in your codebase are always there if you know where to look. Someone claims "Claude has been here," and the evidence? That cursed FINAL_SUMMARY.md file sitting in your repo root. It's like finding footprints in the snow - AI assistants and their weird habit of generating summary files nobody asked for. Eight PRs later and you're still finding random markdown files with perfect documentation that nobody on your team is skilled enough to have written.

The classic Dunning-Kruger effect in its natural habitat. When someone's outside your domain, you nod along with the crowd. But the moment they step into your territory? The emperor's new clothes suddenly look like a Halloween costume from the dollar store. Every dev who's had to sit through a non-technical CEO's "revolutionary" ideas about coding knows this feeling. "Let's rewrite everything in a new language!" Sure, and let's also replace oxygen with cotton candy while we're at it. Trust me, if someone's software takes are garbage, their self-driving cars probably aren't making the best runtime decisions either.

The glorious fall of programmer dignity, visualized in perfect clarity. Once upon a time, developers were digital demigods who wrote code without AI crutches, built entire games in Assembly (because apparently suffering builds character), crafted code that literally sent humans to the moon, and performed memory management wizardry by hand. Fast forward to today's pathetic reality: developers frantically Googling how to center a div (still an unsolved mystery of computer science), begging ChatGPT to fix basic syntax errors, getting permanently trapped in Vim like it's some kind of developer Hotel California, and introducing three new bugs while fixing one—a net negative contribution to humanity. The evolution from muscle-bound coding titans to helpless brain-worms perfectly captures how we've traded actual knowledge for dependency on tools. Progress!

The butterfly meme has evolved into the perfect representation of our current tech landscape. Non-technical executives pointing at literally any software and declaring "IS THIS AI?" while developers frantically try to explain that it's just a simple if-then-else statement they wrote in 15 minutes. The irony is delicious—we've been using conditional logic since the dawn of programming, but suddenly everything with decision-making capabilities gets the "AI" label slapped on it. Marketing departments worldwide just nodded in silent agreement.

The AI benchmarking cult strikes again! Everyone's obsessed with those radar charts comparing Large Language Models using some bizarre "ball turning test" metric that nobody actually understands. It's just a bunch of geometric shapes that supposedly prove one model is better than another. The joke here is that these comparison charts have become so ubiquitous in AI discussions that even though they're practically meaningless to most developers, everyone nods along pretending to understand what they're looking at. Classic tech impostor syndrome - nobody wants to be the one to ask "what the heck does this actually measure?"