Holypointersarehard Batman

Someone said to make function names self-explanatory, and buddy took it literally . The irony is palpable as they create a function called "selfExplanatory" with increasingly chaotic casing and naming conventions, then ask "Am I doing it right?" Meanwhile, the only response is just an opening parenthesis - the universal symbol for "I've given up trying to explain this to you." Nothing says "I understand coding best practices" like completely missing the point while technically following instructions.

Content FBI FB Google Killing a child Google Killing a child process stackoverflow

Content WHAT KIND OF DEV ARE YOU? New School copy paste from ChatGPT Old School copy paste from StackOverflow Ancient DEV copy paste from documentation

OH. MY. GOD. The audacity of this confession! 💅 While the rest of us are slaving away crafting artisanal, hand-coded algorithms like medieval monks illuminating manuscripts, this absolute GENIUS just invented a whole new job title! "Pull Stack Developer" is the programming equivalent of saying you're a chef because you can heat up a frozen dinner. Honey, StackOverflow isn't a buffet where you can just grab whatever looks tasty! Yet here we are, watching someone proudly admit they're basically a digital kleptomaniac with a text editor. The truly SCANDALOUS part? It probably works better than half the code I write from scratch!

Content stackoverflow YAHOO! Answers

The moment someone claims their regex handles "all edge cases perfectly" is when experienced developers reach for the doubt button faster than they reach for coffee on Monday morning. That innocent little pattern is probably hiding six different ways to break your production server when someone inputs an emoji, a null byte, or—heaven forbid—actual human language with accents. The confidence of regex authors is inversely proportional to the number of Stack Overflow tabs they'll need open tomorrow.