When you don't really understand the code base but add a new feature anyway

Content When the new code works only if we don't delete the old code.. fb.meyuva.krishna.memes 4112 2 6 6

Content Anonymous 49787386 4 hr. ago About to start yoga today. Give me some pointers, fit 115.1 kB JPG 7 REPLIES 4 IMAGES Anonymous 49787423 49787386 (OP) Here you go: int x; int y; REPLY 4 hr. ago 0.. 3 REPLIES

Content Q E Overview Source Commits Branches 13 Pull requests Pipelines 9 Issues E Wiki Downloads Boards Wiki Development-Share Latex Links SRS Design Document Google Folder Updated 10 hours from now

The classic developer hack - when you can't change the requirements, just redefine reality. Fallout 3 devs couldn't code a functioning train, so they just slapped a train model on an NPC's head and made him run underground. It's basically the game dev equivalent of saying "it's not a bug, it's a feature" and actually meaning it. Somewhere, a senior engineer is still defending this in architecture reviews as "an elegant solution given the constraints." This is why we can't have nice things... but we do get train hats.

Content Linked List data structures be like: 1 know a guy who knows a guy

The AUDACITY of Microsoft to keep Internet Explorer on life support through Edge's "IE mode" is the tech equivalent of your ex refusing to delete your number! Web developers thought they'd finally escaped the nightmare of IE compatibility, only to find it lurking in Edge like that horror movie villain who JUST. WON'T. DIE. The look of pure trauma on developers' faces when a client says "But it needs to work in IE mode" is absolutely priceless. We've moved from writing code to writing therapy journal entries about our browser PTSD!