Technical Debt

Content while (not edge) ( runli do runt): ) while (not edge).

Content WHEN YOU JOIN A NEW COMPANY AND THE SENIORS TEAM STARTS PUTTING BETS FOR HOW LONG BEFORE YOU RUN AWAY -Hmm -Fuck

The pinnacle of security expertise—someone answering "What screams 'I'm insecure'?" with just "http://" instead of the vastly superior "https://". It's like showing up to a security conference without a password manager and 37 browser extensions that block JavaScript. That lone protocol sitting there, naked and vulnerable, practically begging to have its packets sniffed by anyone with basic networking knowledge. The internet equivalent of leaving your front door not just unlocked, but completely removed from its hinges.

OMG, the AUDACITY of the universe! One minute you're strutting around like the code goddess you are, chin up, confidence through the ROOF, writing what you SWEAR is the most elegant code ever written by human hands... and then BAM! Your code starts throwing errors like it's having an existential crisis! 💀 That smug face in the first panel is all of us living in that brief, beautiful fantasy world where our code works flawlessly. Then reality hits harder than a recursive function without a base case, and suddenly we're staring at our creation like it betrayed our firstborn child. The worst part? Deep down we KNEW this would happen. Yet we still have the nerve to act shocked every single time. It's like a toxic relationship we can't quit!

The virgin API consumer is basically every developer's nightmare journey: drowning in OAuth flows, rate limits hitting like a 429 status code to the face, and having to verify everything short of their grandmother's maiden name just to GET some JSON. Meanwhile, they're shackled by tokens, quotas, and the constant fear that the API provider will yank their endpoint away like a rug. Then there's the chad third-party scraper who just... doesn't care. No OAuth? No problem. Rate limits? What rate limits? They're out here parsing HTML with regex (the forbidden technique that makes computer scientists weep), paying captcha farms pennies, and scraping so fast backends are having existential crises. They've got Selenium, curl, and the audacity of someone who's never read a Terms of Service. The best part? "Website thinks his user agent is a phone" and "doesn't care about changes in policies." While legitimate developers are stuck in OAuth hell, scrapers are just spoofing headers and living their best life. The title references Zombocom, that legendary early 2000s website where "you can do anything" – which is exactly how scrapers operate in the lawless wild west of web scraping. Fun fact: Companies spend millions building anti-scraping infrastructure, yet a determined developer with curl and a rotating proxy can still extract their entire database before lunch.

The code review nightmare in its natural habitat! The reviewer is bombarded with a buffet of coding atrocities—null pointer references lurking in the shadows, deprecated methods that should've been buried years ago, and a loop so obvious it's practically screaming for attention. But the pièce de résistance? That cyclomatic complexity of 36—a number so high it should come with its own warning label. For the uninitiated, cyclomatic complexity measures how many paths code can take. Anything over 10 is considered complex; 36 is basically a labyrinth designed by a sadistic developer who hates their future self. Yet despite this horror show, the reviewer's profound analysis boils down to checking if a variable is false. The cognitive dissonance is exquisite—like bringing a spoon to a gunfight and declaring yourself adequately armed.