in ,

stop functional programming at once!

stop functional programming at once! | programming-memes, program-memes, loc-memes, function-memes, oop-memes, compiler-memes, IT-memes, manager-memes | ProgrammerHumor.io
programming-memes, program-memes, loc-memes, function-memes, oop-memes, compiler-memes, IT-memes, manager-memes | ProgrammerHumor.io

Content

STOP DOING FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING LOOPS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN NAMES YEARS OF HOFs yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for going higher than CALLBACKS Wanted to go higher anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called AbstractWidgetLocalizerManagerFactoryBe "Yes please FOLD over this collection . Please give me a CURRIED function" – Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged Functional LOOK at what Programmers have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the boilerplate compilers we built for them Functional (These are REAL Functions, done by REAL Programmers ): set it Lens’ 8 a – a – g -) set In v g runidentity (la (const (Identity v)) 8) Class Profunctor () :: Maybe a – (a – Maybe b) – Maybe b dinap a over :: Lens’ s a – (a – a) – 8 – s over In g g runidentity (In (Identity viev :: Lens’s a – g – a Inap f dinap f id 01530 10 () :: Maybe a – Maybe b – Maybe b return :: a – Maybe a viev Is v s getConst (la Const s) ????? ??????? ????????????????? "Hello I would like a Monad m please" They have played us for absolute fools