Oh Visual Basic, why did you have to rename everything?

Content Finally

Content "Hi, I'd like to hear a TCP joke." "Hello, would you like to hear a TCP joke?" "Yes, I'd like to hear a TCP joke." "Are you ready to hear a TCP joke?" "Yes, I am ready to hear a TCP joke." "Ok, I am about to send the TCP joke. It will last 10 seconds, it has two characters, it does not have a setting, it ends with a punchline." "Ok, I am ready to get your TCP joke that will last 10 seconds, has two characters, does not have an explicit setting, and ends with a punchline." "I'm sorry, your connection has timed out. ...Hello, would you like to hear a TCP joke?"

Ah, the classic "if it ain't broke, break it" approach to software development! Guy's peacefully riding along with working code, then thinks "let's refactor this perfectly functional code to make it better " and BAM—face-plants spectacularly into dependency hell. This is basically every developer who's ever said "I'll just make a small improvement" at 4:55 PM on a Friday. The bike was fine until you decided to "optimize" it, genius. Next time maybe just commit the working version before you decide to "improve" it?

Content Everyone: it's a game for kids Programmers:

Content Can you approve this merge to master? Whatever. Approve the merge to main. Who's Joe? It's main now. HR doesn't like "master". Joe has to do that. Joe's the Scrum Master.

Sacrificed a potential relationship to explain the entry point of every Java program. That tear isn't from rejection—it's from realizing you spent an hour explaining method signatures instead of making actual conversation. Sure, she now understands the sacred incantation needed to appease the JVM gods, but at what cost? Your dating life? Worth it though. Somewhere out there, she's writing her first Hello World while you're back to debugging in solitude. The curse of knowledge strikes again.