I’m working on a new project

The classic software development Schrödinger experiment: tests are both passing and failing simultaneously until you observe the coverage. Sure, the GitHub badge proudly shows green with "Tests passing" - technically not lying. Meanwhile, the 0% coverage badge silently screams "we wrote exactly ONE test that checks if true equals true." The digital equivalent of putting a single piece of tape over your check engine light and declaring the car "fully serviced."

Content Come to Computer Science! We Have.. moving CPU 011 readwrite device 1011001 memory tape some typewriter lol idk curly bois leaning tower!! Start Initialization O(n!) False Condition True Code Inside Loop StOP hmm fruit loops yummy SNEKS it large

Content WHAT IS A BACKEND DEVELOPER? IM A BACKEND DEVELOPER IT MEANHE IS AFRAID OF ESS NO FLOAT: LEFT STOPIT PATRICK YOU'RESCARINGHIM imaflip.c

Content Me in programming class "Solving" the same if else problems we've been doing for 4 years in pycharm on a PC that barely runs internet explorer: MICHIGA STATE made with mematic ProarammerHumor.io

Ah, the classic D&D alignment chart but for programming languages. C++ is the lawful paladin who follows strict rules but will absolutely destroy you with pointer errors when you least expect it. Python sits in neutral good territory – friendly enough but secretly judges you for not using proper indentation. And then there's Perl, the chaotic good wizard who can solve your problem with a one-liner that looks like someone headbutted the keyboard. The middle row is where the shell scripting languages live in various states of neutrality. BASIC exists in true neutral because it's too old to care anymore. The bottom row is where programmers' souls go to die. Assembly is lawful evil because it makes you do everything yourself, but at least it's honest about it. And MALBOLGE? Named after the eighth circle of hell in Dante's Inferno for a reason. It was literally designed to be as difficult as possible to use. Notably absent: JavaScript, which would need its own category somewhere between "chaotic evil" and "eldritch horror beyond human comprehension."

Look at Perl over here with its revolutionary socialist programming syntax! While other languages force you into the capitalist nightmare of declaring variables with boring words like "public static int," Perl is out here throwing a LINGUISTIC REVOLUTION with "our $i = 1" like it's redistributing the wealth of syntax to the people! 💅 The absolute DRAMA of using "our" instead of "public" and that dollar sign before variables? It's giving communist manifesto but make it code. I simply cannot with how Perl decided to be the people's champion of variable declaration!