I think I will learn Nutella as my next language

Technically correct, which is the best kind of correct. If you define "sufficiently large" as approaching infinity, then yeah, every algorithm becomes O(1) constant time because all those pesky polynomial, exponential, and logarithmic terms just... disappear into the void of mathematical hand-waving. Your bubble sort? O(1). Your traveling salesman brute force? Also O(1). That recursive Fibonacci implementation you wrote in your first CS class? Believe it or not, O(1). It's the ultimate performance optimization—just redefine what "large" means until your Big-O notation looks good on paper. Computer science professors hate this one weird trick! Fun fact: This is basically the algorithmic equivalent of saying "everything is free if you have infinite money." Sure, the logic checks out, but your production server running on actual finite hardware might have some objections.

Content Chris Albon chrisalbon Software engineering pro-tip: Follow Do not, I repeat, do not deploy this week. That is how you end up debugging a critical issue from your parent's wifi in your old bedroom while your spouse hates you for abandoning them with your racist uncle. 8:49 PM - 19 Dec 2017 11,775 Retweets 23,488 Likes 254 17 12K 23K Sat

The political compass, but make it nerdy . This chart perfectly maps the tech world's tribal warfare onto a Freedom-Proprietary and Tradition-Disruption grid. In the top-left, we've got the "Libredev" quadrant where bearded Unix wizards and Emacs cultists fight for software freedom while clinging to technologies older than most junior devs. Think GNU/Linux (yes, you must call it that) and C++ codebases that haven't been refactored since 1997. Top-right "Cogdev" is where Microsoft and corporate tech lives - traditional, enterprise-y, and about as free as a subscription service. These are the folks who think Visual Studio is lightweight and unironically use the phrase "synergistic business solutions." Bottom-right "Soydev" quadrant is where you'll find Apple fanboys and JavaScript framework enthusiasts who will rebuild their entire tech stack every six months because some Medium article told them to. They're disrupting the industry by reinventing the wheel with more dependencies. And finally, bottom-left "Hypedev" - home of Rust evangelists and blockchain bros who won't stop talking about how their technology will save humanity. They're all about disruption and freedom, just don't mention that their revolutionary project is still in beta after 5 years.

BEHOLD! The sacred hierarchy of game development despair! 🎮 Indie devs are literally surviving on POCKET LINT and DREAMS, crafting pixel masterpieces between coffee shop shifts while their bank account screams in agony! Meanwhile, AA studios are just seven random Europeans with a Reddit post and "ugly" assets, desperately clinging to office supply companies for validation. And then there's AAA studios—THE ABSOLUTE MONARCHY OF GAMING—with budgets equivalent to ENTIRE COUNTRIES, Jeff Bezos on speed dial, and development timelines that could be shortened dramatically if you happen to have yakuza connections! They're targeting the mythical "median voter" while indie devs are desperately hoping that "Busted Twunks" who reminisce about Zelda will throw money at their passion project. The gaming industry isn't a spectrum—it's a TRAGIC COMEDY in three acts where the budget difference between "whatever's in the bank account" and "the GDP of South America" determines whether your graphics are pixel art masterpieces or motion-blurred abominations!

Content Using a library to implement a small feature BANDITE Required dependencies

Content HARDCODED VALUES LIGHTYEAR) HARDCODED VALUES EVERYWHERE