Hexadecimal Dedication From Hell

First you learn HTML. Cool. Then JavaScript. Nice. Then you discover you can put JavaScript inside HTML with <script> tags. Wait what? Then you're told about EJS where you write JavaScript inside HTML... but differently? And just when your brain is about to recover, JSX comes along and says "how about writing HTML inside your JavaScript?" The circle of confusion is now complete. No wonder that cat looks like it's questioning its entire existence. The modern web stack isn't a technology—it's a psychological experiment to see how much recursive madness developers will tolerate before they switch to gardening as a career.

Content Kyle KylePlantEmoji 23 godz. Me: I'm so sorry, my dog ate my homework v Comp Sci Professor: your dog ate your coding assignment? Me: Prof: Me: it took him a couple bytes 255 17 18,7K 146K

Discord literally had to implement a self-destruct feature because it was eating so much RAM that it became a liability. When your app is such a memory hog that you need to add a "restart before I crash the entire system" failsafe, maybe—just maybe—wrapping a website in Chromium wasn't the best architectural decision. The fact that 4GB is the threshold tells you everything. That's more RAM than entire operating systems used to need. But hey, at least Discord is self-aware enough to restart itself. Most Electron apps just sit there, bloated and unrepentant, slowly consuming your system resources like a digital black hole until you manually kill them. Fun fact: Each Electron app bundles its own copy of Chromium. So if you're running Discord, Slack, VS Code, and Spotify simultaneously, congratulations—you're running four separate browsers just to use what could've been native apps or actual websites.

Content gamer's casual pc user's programmer's

Content lam not a programmer at all, but I once had to use a scripting program to automate a task at work. My co-workers complained that they didn't know how much was left and wanted a bar. So, I added a loading bar that automatically started at 30, and then every 5 seconds split the remaining and added it on (capping at 99 until done). So: 30, 65 (100-3070; 702 35; 30 (original) 35 65), 82, 91, 96, 98, 99, 99.. After that they loved it. Idiots.

That awkward moment when your code decides to work after you've spent two hours debugging it, and you have absolutely no idea why. Just sitting there with that Kermit face, questioning your entire career choice. Is it cosmic rays? Cache clearing itself? The programming gods taking pity on you? Whatever it is, you'll take the win but deep down you know this mysterious fix will come back to haunt you in production next week. The most terrifying line in programming isn't an error message—it's code that works when it absolutely shouldn't.