What Are Tech Guys Gonna Do?

The formal frog is making a grand announcement about the most trivial of victories - a PR that got merged with a single +1 and -0 change. That tiny diff is the programming equivalent of fixing a typo and acting like you've revolutionized the codebase. Docker builds are notoriously finicky, so when you finally get one working by changing literally one character, you absolutely deserve to announce it with the pomp and circumstance of an 18th century aristocrat. The build is fixed! The kingdom is saved! All hail the developer who added that missing semicolon!

The perfect encapsulation of developer chaos energy. First guy proudly declares "I'm merging it. fuck the tests" with the confidence of someone who's never had to debug a production outage at 2am. Then the follow-up comment claiming test writing is "a sign of weakness" - spoken like someone whose LinkedIn profile probably lists "School of Hard Knocks" as their education. Future them will be frantically typing "how to revert git push force" while their Slack fills with angry messages from coworkers. The bravado of the untested merge is the software equivalent of saying "hold my beer" before attempting a backflip off the roof.

A utopian future where we'd actually have flying cars and advanced technology if only we weren't held back by clunky document formats! Markdown (MD) is like that cool friend who keeps things simple yet powerful, while DOCX and PDF are the corporate overlords who insist on making everything unnecessarily complicated. Just imagine a world where you could easily edit, version control, and collaborate on documents without battling formatting demons or 50MB attachments. The dream died when some executive decided "but can it have 47 different font options though?"

That moment when a junior dev proudly announces they've "cleaned up" the codebase by removing "unused" functions, and suddenly the entire production environment collapses like a tree cut from its support. The code wasn't commented because the senior who wrote it was too busy putting out other fires to document why that "useless" function was actually holding up the entire architecture. Five minutes before the demo, everyone's frantically digging through Git history trying to figure out what the hell that Pink Panther function actually did.

The battle-hardened Senior Dev, riddled with arrows from every direction (missed deadlines, customer complaints, manager whining about slow devs), still finds time to encourage the Junior Dev with a cheerful "Nice PR. You are doing great so far!" It's the perfect metaphor for tech leadership—absorbing all the projectiles of corporate chaos while shielding the newbies from the full horror of production. That armor isn't just for show; it's built from years of git conflicts and Stack Overflow searches!

Ah, the sacred unspoken rules of society! Don't ask women their age, don't ask men their salary, and for the love of all that is holy, DO NOT ask a developer what their commit messages actually mean. That cryptic "Fixed stuff" covering 47 file changes? The mysterious "It works now" with no explanation? The passive-aggressive "Finally fixed the stupid bug"? These are personal diary entries of pain, triumph, and existential crisis that shall remain forever unexplained. Inquiring about commit messages is like asking someone to explain their browser history. Some things are better left buried in the git log where they belong.