Unverified Git User But Still Works

Junior dev discovers their company actually enforces clean git practices and suddenly realizes they can't just nuke their messy commit history with git push --force anymore. The existential crisis hits different when you realize you'll actually have to learn proper rebasing, squashing, and writing meaningful commit messages instead of your usual "fixed stuff" × 47 commits. For context: --force and --force-with-lease let you overwrite remote history, which is great for cleaning up your own branch but catastrophic on shared branches. Most teams disable this on main branches and PRs to prevent people from rewriting shared history and causing merge chaos. Now our friend here has to actually think about their commits like a professional instead of treating git like a save button in a video game. Welcome to the big leagues, where your commit history is public record and your shame is permanent.

The formal frog has entered a new circle of development hell. That moment when a senior dev slides into your DMs with a "quick question" about your PR, and suddenly you're staring at 13,000 downvotes worth of technical debt that someone wants YOU to fix. The green +2,533 represents the handful of sympathetic souls who understand your pain, completely dwarfed by the red sea of "nope" from everyone who knows better than to touch that radioactive codebase. Welcome to git blame roulette, where the prize is becoming the new owner of legacy code nobody has understood since 2014.

The pinnacle of version control laziness: just add * to your .gitignore and call it a day. Why carefully select which files to ignore when you can ignore everything and manually add each file you want? It's like burning down your house to avoid cleaning it, then rebuilding one room at a time. Genius time-saving strategy until you need to git add -f 500 files. Works every time, 0% of the time.

Listen up, sweetie! The universe LITERALLY doesn't care if you mess up your algebra homework or burn your dinner, but make ONE tiny mistake in Git and suddenly you're living in a horror movie! 💀 That innocent little git push --force just turned your entire team's repository into a post-apocalyptic wasteland where no one remembers what code even is anymore. Your career? OVER. Your reputation? DESTROYED. Your will to live? QUESTIONABLE AT BEST. There's nothing more terrifying than staring into the abyss of merge conflicts that YOU created because you thought you were smarter than version control. Sleep tight!

Corporate espionage at its finest. Imagine hiring developers from your competitor only to discover they've been secretly committing garbage code to your repos. The anime facepalm perfectly captures that moment when you realize the "talent acquisition" was actually a Trojan horse operation. The Japanese "計画" (keikaku) in the title translates to "plan" - a nod to the classic anime meme "all according to keikaku," because nothing says strategic sabotage like unnecessarily using Japanese terms in your evil plotting.

GitHub's authentication strategy is like a villain in a noir film: "Please, do enter your password... one last time ." *evil smirk* Nothing says "we care about security" quite like forcing you to type a password they've already decided is obsolete. It's the digital equivalent of making you fill out a form in triplicate just to tell you the office is closed. The transition to token-based auth would be great if they didn't make it feel like you're walking into a trap first. Classic GitHub – making you feel both outdated and suspicious in a single login attempt.