How Steam Was Born

Nvidia's product segmentation strategy has reached galaxy brain levels. The RTX 6040 Ti with 4GB costs $399, but wait—if you want 6GB, that's $499 and you gotta wait until July. Or you could get the base RTX 6040 with... well, who knows what specs, for $299, also in July. It's like they're selling you RAM by the gigabyte with a free GPU attached. The best part? They're calling this the "40 class" when we're clearly looking at a 6040. Nvidia's naming scheme has officially transcended human comprehension. At this rate, by 2027 we'll be buying graphics cards on a subscription model where you unlock VRAM with microtransactions.

Behold, the pinnacle of game development: storing your entire storyline in a global array and using hardcoded indices to track plot points. Because who needs databases or state machines when you can just check if storyline_array[367] == 1 to determine if you've already done something? The real masterpiece is using instance_destroy() as your universal solution. Lunch with Fern? Destroy the instance. Already completed a task? Destroy the instance. Relationship problems? You guessed it— instance_destroy() . Meanwhile, poor Rhode gets the "Do Nothing" treatment. Clearly the developer's favorite character won the popularity contest. This code is basically the digital equivalent of writing your novel's plot points on sticky notes, scattering them across the floor, and numbering them randomly.

NVIDIA CEO: "Just use AI to double your VRAM!" My wallet: *screams in financial agony* 💸 The AUDACITY of suggesting we just casually drop $3000 on a graphics card! What's next? Selling a kidney to run Stable Diffusion? The absolute DELUSION that we're all swimming in money pools like tech billionaires! Meanwhile I'm over here calculating if I can afford both electricity AND ramen this month. The GPU market isn't just a clown show anymore—it's the entire circus, complete with overpriced admission tickets! 🎪

The ultimate first-world gamer problem: having a rig so powerful you have to deliberately handicap it to prevent thermal meltdown. Nothing says "suffering from success" quite like limiting your frames per second because your GPU is too good at its job. Meanwhile, the rest of us are over here trying to squeeze one more year out of graphics cards that sound like jet engines when running Minesweeper.

When your friend discovers you're hardcoding an entire chess game by manually printing each board state for every possible move. 2.6 million lines of code instead of using a chess library or even basic loops? That's not programming, that's digital masochism. The real checkmate here isn't on the board—it's the developer's sanity. Somewhere, a computer science professor just felt a disturbance in the force and doesn't know why.

The programmer community's version of relationship advice is about as reliable as a Windows ME machine connected to public WiFi. That "hide your $3000 GPU from your wife" joke might get you upvotes, but it's the same energy as keeping production secrets in plaintext. Healthy relationships don't need version control to hide your commit history. Meanwhile, the single devs nodding along are the same ones who think they can fix merge conflicts by ignoring them. Trust me, after 15 years in tech, the only thing that should be hidden is your terrible code, not your hobbies.