Just spent 2 hours debugging just to find out it was this

Left side: Scratch mascot saying "Error? What's an error?" because it's designed for beginners with training wheels and bubble wrap. Right side: Java, C++, Python, and JavaScript screaming "Kill yourself" because they'll happily let you run headfirst into a wall of cryptic exceptions that make you question your career choices. Ten years in and I'm still not sure which approach is more psychologically damaging.

Content THIS ISA CRASH. IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR THE BUG, ITS A FEW HUNDRED FEET BACK UP THE TRACK PR

Content iF c "': backtrack if c backtrack 1 o Ou' ..so if the current character is a comma, we set the back- tracking flag.. OF a-z O 110-93 0-937 C PARSE REMOTE CONFIG (HTTPS commit 5763 to here CLI ENTRY caused bug hens or did it just POINT expose it? NEW CONFIG FORMAT PARSER CALLBACK FOR CONFIG STATE Sarah wrote this, maybe ask about weird parse logic? REMOTE CONFIG LOADER A no access to we just re- calculating its state later? 15 ... 00 HEY, SO I JUST SENT YOU AN EMAIL ABOUT THAT THING iP c '". backtrack 1 Jason Heeris 2013 LICENSE: CC BY-NC-ND 2.5 AU heeris.id.au

The classic "Flex Tape" solution meme, but make it programming! Some manager somewhere is watching performance tank because of "mediocre developers" and "slow code due to inefficient algorithms" when suddenly—BAM!—someone slaps on "REWRITING TO RUST" like it's magical duct tape that'll fix everything. Spoiler alert: Throwing a trendy language at architectural problems is like putting racing stripes on a broken car. Sure, your memory management will be safer, but those same mediocre developers will just write mediocre Rust code instead. The compiler will scream, deadlines will extend, and somewhere a project manager's eye is twitching violently.

The eternal developer obsession with refactoring code that has zero practical benefits! The bearded dev isn't refactoring for performance, security, or even browser compatibility—he's doing it because messy code literally follows him like a ghost, haunting every waking moment of his existence. That feeling when you're showering and suddenly remember that nested if-statement monstrosity you wrote six months ago? Pure psychological torture. No wonder we're willing to spend hours "improving" perfectly functional code just to exorcise those code demons from our brains.

Content Top 20 Replies by Programmers when their programs don't work... 20. That's weird... 19. It's never done that before. 18. It worked yesterday. 17. How is that possible? 16. It must be a hardware problem. 15. What did you type in wrong to get it to crash? 14. There has to be something funky in your data. 13. I haven't touched that module in weeks! 12. You must have the wrong version. 11. It's just some unlucky coincidence. 10. I can't test everything! 9. THIS can't be the source of THAT. 8. It works, but it hasn't been tested. 7. Somebody must have changed my code. 6. Did you check for a virus on your system? 5. Even though it doesn't work, how does it feel? 4. You can't use that version on your system. 3. Why do you want to do it that way? 2. Where were you when the program blew up? 1. It works on my machine.