They All Look Almost The Same

The ghost of Stack Overflow past returns with a new disguise! Those AI coding assistants promising to revolutionize programming are just our old friend "unhelpful help" wearing a fancy sheet. You unmask it to reveal the same frustrating experience we've always had - intrusive popups asking if you need help writing a letter when you're clearly in the middle of debugging a critical production issue. The "Don't show me this tip again" checkbox might as well be connected to /dev/null for all the good it does. The more things change, the more they stay infuriatingly the same.

Remember when we used to brag about building an app in 5 hours? Now we're just prompt engineers telling AI, "Hey, make me an app that does X" and then spending 4 minutes and 55 seconds scrolling Twitter while it works. Sure, the AI-built app has 47 different railway tracks going in random directions instead of our nice straightforward solution, but who cares? The client can't tell the difference and we still charge them for the full 5 hours anyway.

When your neural network confidently labels a cat as a dog, but everyone's freaking out about the AI apocalypse. Look, I've been training models for 15 years, and I can assure you the biggest threat isn't Skynet—it's that production code written at 3 AM with no code review. The real uprising will start when my model can correctly identify my cat and remember to order cat food when I'm running low. Until then, we're safe from the robot overlords... probably.

The handshake of deception! Both AI artists and "vibe coders" have found their career shortcut—let the machines do the heavy lifting while you collect the praise. For the uninitiated, "vibe coders" are those developers who spend more time curating their aesthetic GitHub profiles and tweaking VS Code themes than writing actual code. They're the ones who post snippets they didn't write and drop terms like "neural architecture" in casual conversation despite just copy-pasting from ChatGPT. The modern tech equivalent of putting your name on the group project after contributing absolutely nothing. But hey, fake it till you make it, right? Just don't ask them to whiteboard anything without internet access.

The modern tech company hierarchy in one perfect image. Junior dev happily letting AI do the heavy lifting while the senior dev is stuck reviewing 500 lines of algorithmic word vomit. Meanwhile, the project manager is just pointing a gun at everyone's back screaming about deadlines. And there sits the CEO, blissfully unaware in his ivory pew, dreaming about firing the entire dev team because ChatGPT told him it could do their jobs. Ten years of experience just to babysit robot output – exactly what we all went to college for!

Someone woke up and chose violence. The goal here is to feed ChatGPT such cursed, chaotic code that it just gives up and starts hallucinating error messages. Think legacy PHP spaghetti mixed with recursive bash scripts, sprinkled with some jQuery from 2009, all wrapped in a Dockerfile that uses FROM scratch unironically. It's like trying to teach a language model by showing it only the worst code ever written. "Here GPT, analyze this 5000-line function with no comments and 47 nested if statements. Have fun!" The AI equivalent of making someone watch every JavaScript framework tutorial from the last decade simultaneously. Bonus points if the repo includes a README that just says "it works on my machine" and a package.json with 300 dependencies, half of which are deprecated.