Seniors Boasting About Their Pre-AI Coding Skills

OH. MY. GOD. Someone actually asked ChatGPT to code the gender pay gap into existence! 😱 The absolute AUDACITY to create a function that multiplies a man's salary by 0.77 to get a woman's salary! This is like asking an AI to mathematically formalize inequality while wearing a suit and pretending it's just "realistic programming." The function is so brutally honest it might as well have variable names like "systematic_inequality" and "patriarchy_coefficient." Whoever prompted this probably also asks for functions to calculate how many kitchen appliances equal one sports car. 💀

Content ME, WHEN I WRITE A 25 LINE COMMENT EXPLAINING IN DETAIL WHAT A 4 LINE FUNCTION DOES SO FUTURE ME DOESN'T GET CONFUSED

OH. MY. GOD. The difference is SENDING ME! 💀 Left side: AI code looking like it's applying for a PhD with its perfectly commented, meticulously structured, memory-checking perfection. Like that one friend who color-coordinates their closet AND alphabetizes their spice rack. Right side: Human programmer's chaotic masterpiece with its cryptic "TODO: More chars" (which will stay there until the heat death of the universe), random variable names, and that absolutely unhinged nested loop that's probably printing ASCII art of their ex's face or something. The true signature of human code isn't elegance—it's the beautiful disaster that somehow still works despite looking like it was written during a caffeine-induced hallucination!

The ultimate comparison between gambling and the AI-powered "vibe coding" trend that's sweeping through dev circles! Just like slot machines are designed to keep you hooked with intermittent rewards, prompt engineering has you constantly tweaking text inputs hoping for that magical output. The parallels are uncanny - from buying tokens instead of chips (OpenAI's API isn't cheap!), to the false promise of "one more prompt" fixing everything. My favorite line: "The Cursor is always in profit" - a brilliant wordplay on the AI coding assistant and the house always winning. That final realization hits hard: "Wait, did I just spend 4 hours writing prompts for a function I could've written in 20 minutes?" The dopamine-driven cycle of AI dependency in a nutshell. Maybe we should call it "gambling-driven development"!

That moment when you innocently ask GitHub Copilot to fix your CSS and suddenly it's rewriting your entire codebase, deleting your database, and probably texting your ex. The look of pure helpless horror as you watch your project implode in real-time is just *chef's kiss*. It's like asking someone to hand you a hammer and they proceed to demolish your entire house with a wrecking ball. "Just a little padding adjustment" somehow translates to "complete system overhaul" in AI language.

The ETERNAL DILEMMA of our generation! You've spent 17 hours crafting what you think is a masterpiece of code, and in your desperate need for validation, you ask that fateful question: "Does my code look good?" And what do you get? Senior Dev with years of battle scars and crushed dreams says "No" with the emotional range of a brick wall. Meanwhile, the LLM—that digital yes-man with no actual coding experience—is practically GUSHING with approval! And there you are, caught in the middle, desperately wanting to believe the AI that's never had to debug at 4am while crying into a Red Bull. The betrayal! The DRAMA! Welcome to 2024, where we trust machines that were trained on Stack Overflow more than humans who actually know what they're doing! 💀