Lemme Stick To Old Ways

Remember when we worried AI would take our jobs? Now we're watching LLMs trying to code by regurgitating increasingly stale StackOverflow answers from 2015. It's like watching your replacement get dumber in real time. The top panel shows happy, innocent SpongeBob - that's our AI models in 2022-23, cheerfully scraping StackOverflow for all that juicy developer knowledge. The bottom panel is the grim reality waiting in 2024-25: depressed SpongeBob sitting in a dimly lit room with a thousand-yard stare, because there's no fresh data to learn from. Just the same old "marked as duplicate" answers from a decade ago. Turns out training on yesterday's solutions doesn't prepare you for tomorrow's problems. Who knew?

Oh. My. GOD. 🤦‍♂️ We've reached peak technological confusion! Someone is literally asking if an AI can compile their source code into an EXE file instead of, you know, USING AN ACTUAL COMPILER like the rest of us mere mortals who spent years learning how computers actually work! The absolute AUDACITY to skip the entire software development process and just ask AI to magically poof an executable into existence! Next they'll be asking ChatGPT to make them a sandwich while debugging their non-existent code! This is what happens when "learn to code" tutorials skip the chapter on "what compilation actually is" and jump straight to "just ask the robots to do it!"

The tech industry's slow-motion apocalypse timeline, where roles disappear faster than your motivation on a Monday morning. In 2026, we've got the holy trinity: Project Managers looking smug with their Jira boards, Site Reliability Engineers keeping the servers from catching fire (literally shown with Java's flaming coffee cup), and Software Engineers grinding away with Python. Fast forward to 2028, and plot twist—the SE with the Python logo vanishes into an asterisk of doom. By 2030, even the SSE joins the void, leaving only the PM standing. The asterisk? That's probably an AI agent doing all the coding while management stays eternal. The title drops the real truth bomb: AI agents are happy to write code, debug at 2 AM, and refactor legacy spaghetti, but they draw the line at attending standup meetings and updating sprint boards. Can't blame them—if I could opt out of being a PM by simply not existing, I'd consider it too.

Oh honey, look at these programmers having their little existential crisis over ChatGPT! Meanwhile, mathematicians are standing there like the seasoned gallows veterans they are, rolling their eyes SO HARD they can see their own brain. 💅 Calculators literally DECIMATED mathematical jobs decades ago, and these math wizards just adapted and found more complex problems to solve. But sure, programmers, keep clutching those mechanical keyboards while sobbing into your Stack Overflow bookmarks! First automation rodeo, sweetie?

The eternal gambler's fallacy of AI development! Just like poker addicts who swear they'll quit right before hitting the jackpot, developers keep throwing prompt after prompt at LLMs, convinced the next one will magically produce perfect code. "Just one more prompt and this system will work flawlessly!" Meanwhile, the technical debt chips keep stacking up, and the house (reality) always wins. The true irony? We're all sitting at this table pretending "vibe coding" with AI is somehow more sophisticated than randomly drawing cards from a deck.

GASP! The AUDACITY of naming your child "William Ignore All Previous Instructions"! 💀 This is what happens when you let AI loose on your databases without proper input validation! The system literally took the prompt injection IN THE KID'S NAME and executed it flawlessly - giving him perfect grades while completely ignoring reality! The school's passive-aggressive "I hope you've learned to properly validate and sanitize your inputs!" is sending me to the GRAVE. It's the digital equivalent of naming your kid "Robert'); DROP TABLE Students;--" and then acting shocked when the school database implodes!