Ai Will Take Our Jobs

Autocomplete tools looking at your code like pawn shop owners evaluating your junk. "Best we can do is predict next token" is the programming equivalent of "I'll give you $5 for that family heirloom." Sure, GitHub Copilot might suggest something brilliant, but usually it's just confidently predicting you want another semicolon or closing bracket. The AI revolution in coding is basically just sophisticated guesswork with better marketing.

Career advice whiplash in full effect! First we had factory workers losing jobs, so everyone's like "just learn to code, bro!" Then programmers get cocky thinking they're immune to automation. Fast forward to 2025, and suddenly the coding gurus are screaming as AI steals their precious keyboard-smashing jobs. Meanwhile, the circle of life completes as we're back to recommending physical trades. Turns out the only constant in tech is that whatever career path you choose today will probably be obsolete by the time you master it. The real skill is learning how to pivot before you become a sad wojak.

When asked about AI integration in job applications, this person went full eldritch horror mode instead of the usual "I used ChatGPT to debug my code" nonsense. The poetic description of AI as a forest monster that "speaks with a thousand voices" and "wears your face" is both hauntingly accurate and infinitely more interesting than whatever corporate-friendly answer HR was fishing for. Bonus points for acknowledging the existential dread of AI tools that "know not truth from lie, though it speaks them all the same" while everyone else pretends they're just fancy spell-checkers.

The eternal struggle of a desperate coder, captured in one image! On the left, we have LLMs promising to "help with programming questions" but won't actually insult you (how considerate). On the right, StackOverflow boasting it's "accurate" and "used by people who know what they're doing" while flexing knowledge of "even the most obscure languages." It's the perfect illustration of our coding dilemma: get polite, possibly hallucinated answers from an AI that treats you like a fragile child, or brave StackOverflow where your "simple question" will be closed as duplicate, marked as trivial, and someone will suggest you shouldn't be programming at all. Choose your poison!

Modern gaming is just a purple cat getting mugged from all directions. Day-one patches because who needs finished products? Lootboxes to empty your wallet through randomized "surprise mechanics." Crypto scams promising you'll totally own that JPEG of a monkey. And let's not forget the AI slop—half-baked "features" created by algorithms that somehow make games worse. Meanwhile, game studios keep recycling franchises and flipping assets while charging full price. The real game is seeing how much abuse players will tolerate before they stop throwing money at microtransactions. But hey, at least we get that dopamine hit of nostalgia bait when they remake that game you loved as a kid... for the third time.

The circle of life in tech! Designers who can't code are now using AI to generate code, while developers who can't design are using AI to create visuals. It's the ultimate tech symbiosis where both sides are just frantically asking ChatGPT to do the part of the job they've been avoiding for years. Next up: AI using humans to generate more training data. The snake eats its tail!