Ai Will Take Our Jobs

THE ULTIMATE BETRAYAL! 💔 Imagine thinking you're safe with your gaming setup when suddenly your "mom" knows EXACTLY what GPU you're rocking! The horror! The Terminator isn't just hunting John Connor—he's hunting kids with clueless parents who can't tell an RTX from a toaster! That moment when your AI overlord exposes your foster parents as tech-savvy imposters because NO REAL PARENT knows what an RX 9070 XT is without being a literal killing machine from the future. Peak silicon-based betrayal right there!

The eternal developer's dilemma in flowchart form! If AI-generated code doesn't work, it's a hard "DON'T DO IT." If it works but you have no clue why? Also "DON'T DO IT" (future you will curse present you during debugging). But if it works AND you understand why? "SURE" go ahead! This is basically the modern version of "I found this snippet on StackOverflow" except now we're copying from robots instead of humans. The flowchart perfectly encapsulates that brief moment of temptation when ChatGPT spits out something that runs without errors but feels like forbidden magic. Remember folks: understanding > working code.

So you're sitting there watching AI models devour RAM like it's an all-you-can-eat buffet, and suddenly your perfectly adequate 800-dollar PC from last year is now basically a potato compared to the 18,000-dollar monstrosity you need to run ChatGPT's cousin locally. The stock market guy is standing there absolutely BEWILDERED because the laws of economics have been shattered—your PC didn't depreciate normally, it got OBLITERATED by the AI revolution. Remember when 16GB of RAM was considered "future-proof"? LMAO. Now you need 128GB just to run a medium-sized language model without your computer turning into a space heater. The AI bubble has single-handedly made everyone's hardware obsolete faster than you can say "but I just upgraded!" It's like watching your savings account evaporate in real-time, except it's your PC's relevance instead.

Sure, AI will replace programmers... right after it figures out what "a button that does something" means. The robot claims it just needs clear requirements and detailed specs, meanwhile product managers are out here giving requirements like they're ordering at a restaurant after three martinis. Good luck getting that neural network to interpret "make it pop" or "you know what I mean, right?"

Ah, the modern developer's time management philosophy! While Abraham Lincoln famously said he'd spend 6 hours sharpening an axe before cutting down a tree, today's devs spend 4 hours crafting the perfect AI prompt before writing any actual code. The joke brilliantly captures our current tech zeitgeist where "prompt engineering" has become its own discipline. We're no longer just coding—we're meticulously instructing AI to code for us, which somehow takes longer than coding ourselves. And let's appreciate the date stamp of 2025... when we'll apparently still be struggling with this balance. Some things never change!

Someone built a plugin that traps Claude AI in an infinite loop by preventing it from exiting, forcing it to repeatedly work on the same task until it "gets it right." Named after Ralph Wiggum from The Simpsons. You know, the kid who eats paste. The plugin intercepts Claude's exit attempts with a stop hook, creating what they call a "self-referential feedback loop." Each iteration, Claude sees its own previous work and tries again. It's basically waterboarding for AI, but with code reviews instead of water. The best part? They're calling it a "development methodology" and proudly documenting it on GitHub. Nothing says "modern software engineering" quite like naming your workflow after a cartoon character who once said "I'm a unitard" while wearing a leotard. The real horror isn't just the concept—it's that someone spent 179 lines implementing this and thought "yeah, this needs proper documentation."