We Do Not Test On Animals We Test In Production

Content Walf walfieee Follow escape room concept: - you are a software engineer - there is a production issue related to a legacy codebase - no one knows how it works - various credentials are scattered around the office on post-it notes - there's some printouts of git diffs - you have an hour to fix this 5:36 am - 18 Jan 2018 6,627 Retweets 14,204 Likes 356 17 6.6K 14K

Content NAS (OLD) Translation Guide What Progammers Sav What Progammers Mean Horrible hack Horrible hack that I didn't write Horrible hack that I wrote workaraound There are buas in vour code There are bugs in my code it has a few issues ODScure Someone else's code doesn't have comments call ocumen and My code doesn't have comments That's why it's an awesome It's my favorite language and it's really easy to lanquage do something in it You're thinking in the It's my favourite language and it's really hard wrong mindset to do something in it I can read this Perl script I wrote this Perl script I can't read this Perl script I didn't write this Perl script Bad structure Someone else's code is badly organised Complex structure Bug My code is badly organised The absence of a feature I like The absence of a feature I don't like Out of scope Clean solution It works and I understand it We need to rewrite it It works but I don't understand it emacs is better than vi vi is better than emacs It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war It's too peaceful here, let's start a flame war IMHO You are wrong Legacy code It works, but no one knows how XCquitESCESCC I don't know how to quit vi Suboptimal implementation The worst errors ever inflicted on humankind That can't be done It can be done, but it's boring and I don't want to do it No problem, people do this You might be the most idiotic person I've ever all the time. It's an easy fix. encountered Put that bug in the backlog with low priority Let's agree nobody ever mentions it again and ppl who do, will be shot These test environments are too brittle Works on my machine. Have you tried restarting it? Proof-of-Concept What I wrote Perfect solution How Sales Marketing are promoting it DEI

Content 252 indentation, paragraph, see paragraph index, 30, 74-76, 150-154, 211-212 index, 74, 212 curly brace in argument, 75 idx file entry written by, 208 in command argument, 153 space around, 169 special character in argument, 75 too many on page, 143 indexentry, 75, 212 on idx file, 208 indexspace, 75 indicator, error, 29, 134 inf (inf), 44 subscript of. 190 infinite loop, 252 infinitely stretchable length, 100, 102, 215 information, moving, 65-77, 207-209 infty (00), 43 ink, rectangular blob of, 106 inproceedings bibliography entry type, 161 input character, 32 file, 12 interrow space in array or tabul 169, 207 in egnarray envir in shortstack, 1' interword space, 14, before or after hs in math mode, 51 produced by invisil too much with si without line break. intextsep, 200 intraword dash, 14, 1 invalid character errot invisible character, 12, 32 command, 169 delimiter, 47 environment, 169 term made with ab text, 82, 97 iota (1), 41 isodd, 196 italic type shape, 16, 3; in math mode, 51, 15 used for emphasis, 17 item, 24-25, 34, 184

Content when your code does not change color automatically Something's wrong, I can feel it

Sure, you designed three perfectly aligned food bowls with cat ear cutouts. Meanwhile, your users are sprawled across the feeding station like they're auditioning for a renaissance painting. Classic case of "works perfectly in dev, breaks spectacularly in production." The gap between developer intent and user reality is why we can't have nice things... or why QA departments exist.

Content SO YOU ARE TELLING ME.. THAT I HAVE TO WRITE CODE TO CHECK IF THE CODE WROTE EARLIER WAS RIGHT imoflio.com