Type Safety Prevents Emotional Damage

Ah yes, the classic "$800,000 bootcamp" that promises to transform you into a software engineer in just 3 months by teaching you *checks notes* approximately 87 programming languages, including some that barely exist anymore. Nothing says "legitimate education" like cramming Fortran, COBOL, and Assembly alongside React and TypeScript into 90 days. The "if you can't find a job you can spit on our faces" guarantee is the cherry on top of this scam sundae. Spoiler alert: The only thing you'll master in 3 months is how to lose $800K faster than a startup with free snacks and ping pong tables.

A programmer's twist on the classic "what girls want" tweet! While the original tweet suggests girls want "commitment" (starts with C), our battle-scarred dev responds with the ultimate programmer dad joke: "Go and Rust are memory safer, but you do you." It's the perfect marriage of programming languages and dating humor. Sure, Go and Rust handle memory management safely, but C? That's living dangerously—manual memory allocation with no safety nets. Like dating someone who says "I don't believe in labels" on the first date. Segmentation faults in your code or your love life? Choose wisely.

The programming language you choose apparently dictates your entire personality. Low-level language devs (Assembly, C++, Java) become muscular specimens who probably bench press servers in their spare time. Rust programmers evolve into anime protagonists with questionable hairstyles. JavaScript folks transform into tactical operators ready to deploy hotfixes like special forces. And Python users? They become that one guy at the office who's just a bit too smug about solving everything in one line of code. The circle of programming life complete.

The entire tech industry building massive, complex systems while Rust sits in the corner like that one tiny critical bolt holding everything together. Sure, let's keep piling more JavaScript frameworks on top while pretending our foundation isn't held together by some memory-safe code written by people who actually care about not segfaulting in production. That single Rust component is probably preventing half the internet from imploding on Tuesday afternoons.

This meme is a hilarious take on the Rust programming language's reputation in the developer community! At the top, we see a beautiful, thriving ecosystem with a C language logo sun shining brightly. Meanwhile, underground there's a dark cave where the Grim Reaper (representing memory safety issues) is filming people worshipping an angry crab with lightning bolts (the Rust mascot/logo). The title "isRustEvil" is playing on the joke that Rust enthusiasts are sometimes viewed as cult-like in their devotion to the language. While C sits above in the established programming world, Rust is portrayed as this underground movement with zealous followers. The meme pokes fun at how some developers view Rust advocates - as if they're part of some strange cult that worships memory safety and ownership principles while demonizing languages like C. The person trying to climb out represents developers trying to escape the "Rust evangelism strike force" that's always telling everyone to rewrite everything in Rust! It's a classic example of programming language tribalism taken to a hilarious extreme. Whether you're a Rust fan or skeptic, you've probably encountered the passionate debates about whether Rust should replace C/C++ in systems programming.

The first two panels show our protagonist happily accepting normal entry point functions in Rust and C/C++. "Yeah, that makes sense!" she cheerfully exclaims. Then panel three hits with Python's bizarre if __name__ == '__main__': pattern - the cursed incantation every Python dev has blindly copy-pasted a thousand times without questioning why we need this arcane check just to run a damn script. And that final panel? Pure existential horror. Seven years into my career and I still type this abomination with muscle memory while silently wondering who hurt the Python designers.