This one hit a bit close to home

Content Boss: this code is so good! Boss: why is this code so trash? ProdrammerHumor in My code Our code

Content FOCUS HEY! DO YOU I HAVE 1SEC? NEVERMIND WHAT WAS I DOING ? MONKEYUSER.COM

Content Scientists: the human brain has a computation power of over 1 exaflops Me: trying to calculate 18 84-34 made with mematic

Content garbagegnostic femmelatula Follow 134 134 ihelli hell. nuevO beingacomputerprogrammingmajor : Testing out html scripts on Pokemon Go and finding out it actually works morphimus Isn't this a potential problem though? Can you run a malicious script in the namebox there? If so, they will most certainly have to fix that before they implement trading. nickelbackmidisonline is it even possible to write a malicious script in html? timujina hacki'm inhack Source: nuevo 16.610 notes

The love-hate relationship with Python in a nutshell. First you're screaming at it to get out of your face, then you violently attack it, but inevitably end up consuming it bit by bit until you're in a blissful state of Python-induced euphoria. We've all been there—cursing Python's indentation rules or package management at 2 PM, only to find ourselves at 6 PM dreamily writing one-liners that would take 50 lines in Java. The Stockholm syndrome of programming languages.

Ah, the four stages of revisiting your old code. First, shock and horror. Second, disbelief and confusion. Third, existential questioning of your life choices. And finally, that moment of clarity when you remember exactly what sleep-deprived, caffeine-fueled nightmare led to that particular implementation. Nothing quite like that special feeling when you realize your past self left absolutely zero comments and variable names like 'temp1', 'temp2', and the ever-helpful 'finalFinalREALLYfinal'. Your past self is always your future self's worst enemy.