No I Don't Want To Go Back

Ah, the classic developer defense mechanism. When family asks what you actually do all day, it's easier to wave a hand mysteriously than explain why you spent four hours debugging a missing semicolon. The truth is we're just frantically Googling error messages and praying Stack Overflow stays online. But "mysterious and important" sounds way better than "I stared at compiler errors until my eyes bled, then celebrated fixing a bug by creating three more."

Content Semen Danilenko What's the most unusual thing you've found in the server room? yesterday at 18:27 Reply Mikhail Bogatov Semyon, Soviet guided anti-tank projectile 9M14 ... vesterday at 19:37 Reply

The security industry in a nutshell, folks. You hire "analysts" who confirm they're analysts, confirm they get paid to analyze, but when they actually find something—like a Log4j vulnerability that needs immediate patching—management's response is "Nah, P0 incident? That's an EOD problem." Nothing quite like hiring security experts only to ignore their expertise when it requires actual work. The classic corporate cycle: pay for security, ignore security recommendations, wonder why you got breached. Then blame the security team who warned you six months ago. For the uninitiated, Log4j was that delightful little vulnerability from 2021 that had security teams working through Christmas while executives were sipping eggnog and asking "can't we just deal with it after the holidays?"

Behold, the physical manifestation of Microsoft's AI ambitions. A green bicycle literally branded "Co-Pilot" tangled in a mess of cables. Just like the real GitHub Copilot - looks promising until you realize it'll get hopelessly entangled in dependencies and legacy code. At least when this one crashes, you only break your collarbone instead of production.

Just another Tuesday, paddling through the 1.3 million packages on NPM, hoping to find that magical dependency that won't introduce 300 vulnerabilities or break your entire project next week. The search continues through the endless sea of abandoned projects, cryptominers, and that one package with decent documentation but hasn't been updated since 2017. Keep rowing.

When a site tells you "your new password can't be the same as your old password," they're supposed to be comparing hashed values, not storing your actual password in plaintext. If they know what your old password was , they've already failed Security 101. The fact that a Fortune 500 company did this is like finding out your bank keeps everyone's money in a shoebox under the receptionist's desk. Ten years in tech and I'm still amazed at how many multi-billion dollar companies can't figure out basic password security.