Just Why

Content Backend Fronte 580 Interal Server Error

Content Bad X 10; Better X1111111111 Good Pro for (int i0;1-11 ; i --) X -i; do X new Random( ) . nextint); while (x!10);

OH. MY. GOD. The absolute AUDACITY of this person claiming they "use C++ in JavaScript" only to reveal they're just using the increment operator in a for loop! 😱 The sheer DRAMA when they're challenged to "SHOW ME" and they proudly display that pathetic c++ in their loop like it's some groundbreaking achievement! Honey, that's not C++ programming, that's just the increment operator that exists in LITERALLY EVERY C-STYLE LANGUAGE EVER CREATED! 💅 And the reaction? PRICELESS! The absolute howling laughter is what happens when you make such a ridiculous claim in front of actual developers. It's like saying you speak French because you can say "oui oui" while eating a croissant! I CANNOT with these people! 🤦‍♀️

[text] mun.n. wmns THATS. B N 2 Ve IIMEAHSIIESI 00 R I G el mmmmmm

Content Tomato sauce 07:00 V ... Why 07:01 07:01 For your spaghetti code 07:01 J

The classic "it's not you, it's me" breakup line gets a multithreaded makeover! Our poor developer thought throwing mutexes and closing channels would fix their relationship problems, but they missed the fundamental truth of concurrent programming: no amount of locks can protect you from emotional deadlocks. Meanwhile, their partner is contemplating switching to the "Hawk TUAH" - which is either some obscure programming framework or proof that even in bed, developers are thinking about optimizing performance. Spoiler alert: neither mutexes nor Hawk TUAH will save this relationship from its fatal exception.