How programmers comment their code...

When VS Code decides it's had enough of your spaghetti functions and infinite loops. That error message might be fake, but the feeling is painfully real. Every developer knows that moment when your editor might as well just say "I give up" instead of pointing out the actual syntax error on line 347. The only thing missing is VS Code slowly clapping while it watches you struggle through your 5th refactor attempt.

Content Dataset 1999 - Nineteen Ninety nine 1888- Eighteen Eighty light 1777-Seventeen Seventy Seven 1111-2229 ELEVEN HUNDRED ELEVEN Me ONETEEN ONETY ONE AI

Content the ONION LATEST POLITICS SPORTS LOCAL ENTERTAINMENT ONION GAMERS NEWS StackOverflow commenter cannot believe you would bother him with such a pathetic question 20413 3:45pm SEE MORE: NEWS v SAN FRANCISCO, CA- Taking time out of his busy day of browsing Hacker News and closing GitHub issues, senior software developer Jeff Corbett replied to your StackOverflow question this afternoon, to let you know that your question is a waste of his time. "This is answered in the spec, I suggest you read it", he wrote, without explaining to which spec he was referring, or what it said. At press time, Corbett had reportedly closed the issue as a duplicate, without linking to any related posts that might have helped answer the original question.

[text] n.r u.

The greatest lie in software development: "My code is self-documenting!" Meanwhile, senior devs are laughing because they've inherited enough "perfectly clear" codebases to know that future-you will stare at your own creation six months later like it's ancient hieroglyphics written by a caffeinated squirrel. The only thing that speaks for itself in programming is the inevitable technical debt when documentation is skipped.

Content