Good Deeds

Content Jim Manico manicode 4h The governor of New Jersey just put out the call on live TV that he is desperate for Cobol programmers right now. 85 17448 722 d distracteddb 2h REFRES Can't tell if joking 02 Jim Manico manicode Not joking at all; for the unemployment system. 15:29 - 04.04.20 Twitter for iPhone

OH. MY. GOD. That's not an eldritch ghost - it's a catastrophic memory corruption that's turned this poor laptop into a digital hellscape! 😱 The screen is LITERALLY BLEEDING corrupted data and random characters like some kind of possessed computer demon! And the file size at the bottom? "71,022 bytes" - that's not a file, that's a CRIME SCENE! The most terrifying part? The "Im Scare.mp3" in the file list - as if this computer KNEW it was about to summon the digital apocalypse! This is what happens when you try to exit Vim without reading the manual first! 💀

HOLY CAFFEINE OVERLOAD! Ever written code at 4AM thinking you've created a MAJESTIC DRAGON of elegant algorithms, only to wake up at 10AM and discover it's actually just a sad little lizard crawling on a plastic toy castle? 😂 That late-night coding euphoria is a dangerous drug - making you believe you're crafting digital masterpieces when you're really just slapping together spaghetti code that future-you will absolutely despise. The 4AM-to-10AM transformation is the greatest reality check in programming history!

Content What I see: templatetypename T concept Vector2Type requires requires Type: :ArithmeticT, T; requires Type: :ArithmeticT, float; requires Type: :ConstructibleT, float, float; T::x; T::; templatetypename T concept Vector3Type requires requires Vector2TypeT; requires Type: :ConstructibleT, float, float, float; T::z; What normal people see: ProarammerHumor.io

Content Finally, after years of search I found a real tree

You know that developer who keeps insisting their code works fine despite failing every single test? Yeah, they're about to say "quick win" for the 47th time today while proposing yet another "temporary" workaround that'll definitely become permanent technical debt. The intensity in those eyes isn't anger—it's the pure, concentrated frustration of a senior dev who's heard "quick win" used to justify skipping unit tests, hardcoding API keys, and deploying directly to production on a Friday afternoon. Say it one more time and watch them write a 3000-word RFC on proper development practices. Pro tip: If someone calls something a "quick win" more than twice in one sprint planning meeting, it's neither quick nor a win. It's usually a shortcut that'll haunt your codebase like a ghost in the machine.