Developers Will Always Find A Way

Game design grad school: where you enter looking like a functional human and exit looking like you've been debugged by a randomized algorithm. The transformation from "ready for a date" to "hasn't seen sunlight since the last Steam sale" happens faster than a garbage collector on a memory leak. Game dev students are just speedrunning the "descent into madness" questline while their non-technical friends still think they're "just playing games all day." Spoiler alert: the final boss is your own sanity, and nobody's found the cheat code yet.

Remember when we thought AI would just take over mundane jobs? Fast forward to 2023, and GitHub Copilot is writing code while game developers are sweating bullets. The Terminator isn't coming for Sarah Connor anymore—it's coming for your job security and your gaming time. Soon we'll all be sitting in corners wondering what's left for humans to do besides watching AI play better Halo than we ever could.

The code is a perfect example of why game developers shouldn't be allowed near RNGs unsupervised! 😂 What we're looking at is a glorious mess of Python where someone created two nearly identical functions ( count_greater_than_11 and count_greater_than_5 ) that generate random numbers between 1-20 and increment a counter when the number exceeds a threshold. But wait! The function names and comments don't even match - one says "greater than 11" in the comment but checks for > 10 in the code, while the other claims to check for > 5 but actually checks for > 4! And then there's that lonely is_divisible_by_7 function at the bottom, just hanging out with no apparent connection to anything else. It's like someone started implementing their own version of RNG bias with specific magic numbers, got bored halfway through, and shipped it anyway. This is probably why that boss battle feels unfairly difficult every 7th attempt...

Ah, the project graveyard – where dreams go to hibernate indefinitely. That folder structure on the right isn't just storage, it's a memorial to our collective optimism. We all start with "JUST MAKE IT EXIST FIRST" – that beautiful cyan circle of possibility – convinced this time we'll finish what we started. Then reality kicks in. That 3D spaceship model? That game engine experiment? That revolutionary app idea? All neatly tucked away in folders, waiting for the mythical "when I have time" that never arrives. The true skill isn't starting projects – it's finishing one before getting seduced by the next shiny idea. Meanwhile, our hard drives become digital museums of what-could-have-been.

Ah yes, the elusive GPU "sale" - where $3,229 is considered a bargain. For just the price of a used car, you too can render shadows in real-time while your bank account renders itself empty. The best part? That whopping $0.99 discount. Nothing says "financial responsibility" like spending three grand on hardware that'll be obsolete the moment you finish installing the drivers.

Ah, the classic dilemma of the paranoid developer. Rejecting the simple "Save Game" option because deep down we all know that's just begging for a crash. Meanwhile, the "Save and Exit Game" option gets the approving nod because it's like wearing both a belt AND suspenders. Why trust a single save operation when you can immediately retreat to safety? It's not paranoia if the code really is out to get you. The unspoken truth of game development: nothing validates your trust issues quite like losing three hours of progress because you dared to believe in a simple "Save" button.