Straight To Flexbox

Nature's warning system: bright yellow and black = STAY AWAY. Poison dart frogs? Deadly gorgeous. Coral snakes? Fashion-forward killers. And then there's JavaScript with its cheerful yellow logo, sitting there all innocent-looking while it casually lets you add strings to arrays, compare bananas to motorcycles, and returns "undefined" when you sneeze wrong. The comparison is *chef's kiss* because just like those venomous creatures, JavaScript lures you in with its accessibility and vibrant ecosystem, then BAM—you're debugging why [] + [] = "" but [] + {} = "[object Object]" and questioning every life choice that led you to web development. It's the programming equivalent of touching a pretty frog and immediately regretting it. But hey, at least those animals have the decency to warn you upfront. JavaScript just smiles and says "everything is fine" while your type coercion nightmares multiply in the background.

You try so hard to dodge the AI hype train. You stick to your principles. You refuse to add "AI-powered" to every feature. You won't shoehorn ChatGPT into your perfectly functional app. You're building real software, not buzzword bingo. Then Firefox—yes, FIREFOX, the browser that's supposed to be the scrappy underdog fighting for an open web—comes flying in with a haymaker of AI features you never asked for. Sidebar chatbots, AI-generated alt text, the whole nine yards. Even the good guys have fallen. There's no escape. Every company from your local pizza shop to your IDE is cramming AI into places it doesn't belong. The future isn't AI. The future is being beaten into submission by AI whether you like it or not.

Content My daughter tells me you are a programmer. Is that right ? Yes Sir! I'm a HTML programmer You have 10 seconds to get off my property.

Content lbaum oscherler Oct 30 JavaScript makes me want to flip the table and say "Fuck this shit", but I can never be sure what "this" refers to. RETWEETS 783 LIKES 662

Content When you stringify two arrays in order to check if they are identical Moto

Backend developers drawing their own crude solutions with a pen, while frontend devs ride in on majestic white horses looking like wizards from fantasy epics. The irony? Backend code powers everything but looks like it was scribbled by a toddler, while frontend is just there to make users go "ooooh pretty buttons" while secretly being held together with duct tape and Stack Overflow answers. Let's be honest though—both sides think the other has it easy. Meanwhile, full-stack developers are just over here trying to be both at once, probably looking like Gandalf riding a horse with a crayon in hand.