Tale As Old As Programming History

Content When you are midway through cleaning your keyboard but finally figure out how to fix that one bug made with mematic

Content Co-worker: We need to debug this Me: Okay let me break out my tools Me: printf

That moment of horrified recognition when you excavate ancient code from your digital crypt. "Who wrote this abomination? Oh wait... it was me." The psychological journey from confidence to shame happens in milliseconds as you stare at variable names like 'temp1', 'finalFinalVersion', and comments promising to "fix this later." Your past self has left landmines of technical debt that your present self must now defuse while questioning every life decision that led to this moment.

Content Wear Galaxy Wearable (Samsung Gear) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Uninstall Open What's new Last updated Oct 16, 2022 - Fixed the error.

The code is a perfect example of why game developers shouldn't be allowed near RNGs unsupervised! 😂 What we're looking at is a glorious mess of Python where someone created two nearly identical functions ( count_greater_than_11 and count_greater_than_5 ) that generate random numbers between 1-20 and increment a counter when the number exceeds a threshold. But wait! The function names and comments don't even match - one says "greater than 11" in the comment but checks for > 10 in the code, while the other claims to check for > 5 but actually checks for > 4! And then there's that lonely is_divisible_by_7 function at the bottom, just hanging out with no apparent connection to anything else. It's like someone started implementing their own version of RNG bias with specific magic numbers, got bored halfway through, and shipped it anyway. This is probably why that boss battle feels unfairly difficult every 7th attempt...

Ah yes, the superhero we didn't know we needed—Spider-Man dropping truth bombs at tech conferences. While product managers obsess over button colors and "intuitive interfaces," developers are battling legacy codebases held together by StackOverflow answers and pure spite. Companies will spend millions on UX research but won't invest in decent documentation or give developers time to refactor code that's one semicolon away from sentience. Remember: behind every seamless user experience is a developer who sacrificed their sanity, sleep, and will to live. Your fancy app exists because someone stared at a terminal until 4 AM wondering if they should just become a goat farmer instead.