And Im Usually Happy About This

Ah, the classic Teletubbies invasion of your codebase! The meme brilliantly shows how synchronous functions (a through e) work together in harmony, holding hands in a neat little circle. But then that one async function shows up and BOOM – suddenly your clean execution flow is replaced by an army of purple creatures taking over everything. This is basically what happens when you introduce that first async function into your previously synchronous paradise. One minute you're writing nice, predictable code where everything happens in order. The next minute you're dealing with promises, callbacks, race conditions, and wondering why your console is printing results in what seems like a completely random order. And just like Teletubbies, once async enters your codebase, it multiplies uncontrollably until your entire project is saying "Eh-oh" to debugging sanity.

Content YOU HAVE PROBLEMS IN PRODUCTION I HAVE PROBLEMS BEING PRODUCTIVE WE'RE NOT THE SAME

Content IF YOU CAN'T DESCRIBE YOUR JOBIN 3 WORDS X BULLSHIT JOB X BULLSHIT JOB I'M A SAAS - BASED FIN - TECH SALES ANALYST I DEVELOP MAINTAIN AUTO MATE D CAPABILITIES CREATE SYSTEMS TO RECORD BLOCKCHAIN DATA CATCH PHISH REAL Jo B X BULLSHIT J0B YOU HAVE R BULLSHIT JOB

Content CHAT GPT COPILOT 44. Look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power

Content Could'vou perhans. ello, Meand you area commier guy programmer mrogrammer No me alavoura rogrammer

Oh look, it's the final boss of Stack Overflow! This guy's "somewhat confident" after a CS degree and 16 years of experience is like saying the Titanic was "somewhat damp." The retro setup with vintage computers and that hacker aesthetic screams "I was writing code when your IDE was still a twinkle in Microsoft's eye." He's holding that ancient computer like it's a sacred text while silently judging your for-loop efficiency. This is the guy who closes your question as "duplicate" before you finish typing it. His confidence level? Just enough to tell you your perfectly working code is "technically wrong."