In Ception

Content JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN SPEND AN HOUR MAKING YOUR CODE 5 MILLISECONDS FASTER DOESNT MEAN YOU SHOULD

Content Learning JavaScript after having only worked with strongly types languages before: COGiC Aaaah aaa everything's crooked, reality is poison Iel wanna go back. I hate this!

Content 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 include stdio.h include stdlib.h char string "const exec require ('child process'); n" "const fs require('fs'); In" "fs.writeFileSync('main.py', 'print("Hello World!")'); n" "exec ('python main.py', , (error, stdout, stderr) console. log (stdout) ;);" int main(int arge, char kwargs) FILE file fopen("main.is' "w"); fprintf(file, string); fclose (file); system("node main.js"); return 0;

The existential crisis of a full stack developer captured in one perfect image. In the top row, we have animals lamenting their limitations—a dog can't fly, a fish can't walk, a chick can't swim, and a duck looks on smugly. But then comes the "Full Stack Developer" transformation—suddenly all these creatures are happy despite their limitations. Why? Because that's the essence of full stack development: being mediocre at everything but convincing yourself (and hopefully your employer) that you're somehow qualified to do it all. It's the tech industry's greatest con job—jack of all trades, master of none, yet still employed. The duck's smug grin says it all: "I can barely do any of these things well, but my LinkedIn says I'm proficient in 47 technologies."

Content When Python finishes a task before Ct Confused screaming

Content When you add a string to an integer and wait for an error but javascript returns a string JS Parkour!