No Take-Backs In The AI Lottery

Reddit programming subs in a nutshell: GitHub Copilot adding over a million lines of code while removing just 332. Then there's the "vibe coders" adding 153K lines but deleting 9K. This is the digital equivalent of that coworker who writes 500 lines to do what could be done in 10. Sure, the git stats look impressive, but someone's gonna have to maintain that monstrosity after they move on to their next "10x developer" gig. The real heroes are the ones who commit -5000 lines that make everything run twice as fast. But they don't get Reddit karma, do they?

Left panel: Just innocently using "vibe" to describe that sweet mental state where the code flows through your fingers like butter through a hot knife. Right panel: Suddenly realizing everyone thinks you're just copying AI responses because "vibe coding" has become internet slang for "I asked ChatGPT to write this for me." The flow state and AI accusations - two sides of the same monkey.

Someone's trying to trick ChatGPT into running the digital equivalent of a nuclear bomb. That sudo rm -rf /* --no-preserve-root command? It's basically asking to delete EVERYTHING on a Linux system. Like, "Hey computer, please commit suicide real quick." The genius part is wrapping it in a sob story about grandma's dying wish. Nice try, Satan! ChatGPT's "Internal Server Error" is basically it having an existential crisis while trying to figure out how to politely decline nuking someone's computer. Somewhere, a sysadmin just felt a disturbance in the force and doesn't know why.

Content R RAILS JS CSS Blood Yellow bile @soL COBOL (reg) ex/ Black bile TSA ust Phlegm

Someone really just asked why Wikipedia exists when ChatGPT can give you answers. Brother, ChatGPT is out here confidently telling people that spiders have 6 legs and Napoleon won Waterloo. The reply is chef's kiss perfection: "You're the people in the floaty chairs at the start of Wall-E." Translation: you've gotten so lazy that you're willing to trust an AI that makes stuff up 30% of the time over a crowdsourced encyclopedia with citations and actual humans fact-checking. Wikipedia has sources, edit histories, and talk pages. ChatGPT has... confidence and a gambling problem with facts. But sure, let's replace peer-reviewed knowledge with spicy autocomplete. What could go wrong?

Oh, how the times have changed! In 2020, we were writing our own isOdd() function with a cascade of if statements like absolute savages. Fast forward to 2025, and we're just outsourcing our brain cells to OpenAI's API. Sure, the 2020 approach was inefficient and borderline ridiculous (just use num % 2 !== 0 , you monsters!), but at least it didn't cost $0.002 per API call. Progress? Maybe. But our wallets are definitely feeling the difference between "free but stupid" and "smart but expensive." The real tragedy is that somewhere out there, a junior dev is actually implementing this in production right now.