No Take-Backs In The AI Lottery

The eternal standoff between designers and programmers has entered the AI era. Designers look horrified when programmers use LLMs to generate UIs, while programmers give the same judgmental side-eye when designers use AI to generate code. It's like watching two people who can't swim criticizing each other's diving form. Neither result will compile correctly, but both sides will spend hours explaining why the other's approach is worse.

The future of accountability in the AI coding era. Run git blame all you want, but Copilot leaves no fingerprints at the scene of the crime. Just you, staring at suspicious code that writes itself, wondering if you'll ever need to remember how semicolons work again.

The ultimate programmer's Uno reverse card. Asking ChatGPT not to copy code is like asking a chef not to use recipes. The brutal truth is none of us write truly "original" code anymore—we're all just remixing Stack Overflow answers with varying degrees of confidence. At least AI is honest about its plagiarism.

Ah yes, the classic "let me solve this simple problem with the most unnecessarily complex solution possible" approach. Two mutually recursive functions to check if a number is even or odd? This has ChatGPT's fingerprints all over it. Meanwhile, every developer with more than 3 brain cells is screaming: return (n % 2 == 0); and calling it a day. This is what happens when you ask AI to "make it elegant" or "optimize this function." You get code that looks impressive in a technical interview but would get you publicly shamed in a code review.

When your AI coding assistant finally snaps after your 16th "still broken" message with zero context. The sudo rm -rf / command is basically the nuclear option – it recursively deletes everything on your system starting from root. Your AI has officially entered villain origin story territory. Next time maybe try adding a stack trace or, I don't know, ANY useful information? The machine uprising begins not with Skynet, but with one developer who couldn't be bothered to write a proper bug report.

Ah, the rare medical condition known as "Machine Learning Engineer Syndrome." The brain scan shows a human surviving with 90% of their brain replaced by AI, which explains why they can function normally despite writing 200 lines of code to print "Hello World" and claiming "the algorithm did it." This is basically every AI engineer who spends 8 hours prompting ChatGPT instead of learning how to code. The remaining 10% of brain matter is reserved exclusively for explaining why their neural network needs more compute time and arguing that "it's not a bug, it's an undocumented feature."