I Have Won But At What Cost

Content MACHINE LEARNING inglip.com

The eternal academic turf war continues! Physicists spend decades unraveling the mysteries of the universe, publishing papers nobody reads, and surviving on ramen... only to watch some CS grad who taught a computer to play tic-tac-toe walk away with the Nobel. That sideways glance of existential despair is every physicist who just realized they picked the wrong major. Meanwhile, CS folks are too busy counting their tech stock options to even notice they won.

The eternal dance between developers and regex—a cryptic language that might as well be ancient runes. When ChatGPT spits out a working regex that looks like someone headbutted a keyboard, what do we do? Copy-paste that mystical incantation and back away slowly. It's the modern equivalent of summoning a demon—you don't need to understand the Latin, you just need the spell to work. And when it does? Pure dopamine. That smug satisfaction of solving a problem without actually understanding the solution is programming at its finest. Future you will hate present you when that regex breaks in six months. But that's a problem for future you, who is, quite frankly, a bit of a buzzkill anyway.

When the job description says "R knowledge required, Python mostly used," but then you show up and discover it's 99% R with that one random pandas script someone wrote 3 years ago. The classic bait-and-switch where data scientists get lured by the promise of Python only to find themselves knee-deep in R's cryptic syntax and bizarre indexing. Meanwhile, Python sits there looking all smug because everyone claims to love it, but nobody actually lets you use it for the cool projects.

The ultimate Twitter thread showdown between AI doomers and actual software engineers! Someone claims junior devs earning $145K are obsolete because a $200/month ChatGPT agent could replace them. Then a real developer steps in with the cold, hard truth: AI still hallucinates features, needs constant supervision, and can't replace human judgment. The punchline? The doom-preaching critic admits they've never actually built anything themselves! Classic armchair expert syndrome - proclaiming the death of an entire profession while having zero practical experience. That thumbs-up at the end is peak chef's-kiss irony.

You know that absolutely GLORIOUS moment when you ask ChatGPT something and it's like "wow, what an excellent question!" and then proceeds to completely malfunction on that exact same question for the 50th time today? Yeah, nothing screams "I'm a genius" quite like repeatedly breaking an AI that's supposed to be smarter than you. The smug goat energy is REAL here. You're out there feeling like you've discovered some profound edge case that's exposing the limits of artificial intelligence, when in reality you're probably just asking it to parse some cursed regex or explain why your CSS isn't centering a div. But hey, if stumping a billion-dollar language model doesn't earn you a PhD in Computer Science, what does? The best part? You'll screenshot that "great question" compliment and frame it on your wall while conveniently ignoring the fact that ChatGPT still can't solve your actual problem. Peak developer validation right there.