Reusing code

Content Tiago W BE wbetiago 21h Enough of this non sense... lam building my own Email server! I will be able to send as many emails as I want! Muhahahaha 023 17 26 Ill 6,833 Ryan Badger ryanseanbadger Replying to wbetiago You'd have better luck getting email delivered if you printed them and used the post.

Content WERE LOOKING GOR SOMEONE AGE22-26 WITH 30-YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Reading "Multithreading for Dummies" doesn't make you an expert. The guy thinks he's ready to impress his date's father with parallel programming knowledge, but dad's already starting the countdown thread in the background. Classic case of a junior dev who skimmed the documentation and now thinks they can handle race conditions. Meanwhile, the father process is about to terminate this conversation with extreme prejudice.

Content When you're a programmer and see a hacking scene in a movie He is just updating the system and installing random packages ProgrammerHumor.

Content Me: Mutes Google's mic Me: Okay Google Google: The microphone is muted Me: ProarammerHumor.io

In Rust, you have to explicitly mark code as unsafe when you're about to do something that might summon demons from the ninth circle of memory hell. Meanwhile in C++, the entire language is basically one giant unsafe block where dangling pointers and buffer overflows are just part of the authentic experience. It's like driving a car with no seatbelts, airbags, or brakes—but hey, at least it's fast! The irony is that in C++, the unsafe part is invisible—it's just assumed you enjoy living dangerously. Rust at least has the courtesy to make you type out "I know what I'm doing" before it lets you shoot yourself in the foot.