Once is never enough!

Ah yes, nothing says "efficient solution" like using a machete labeled "Deep learning" to slice through a tiny piece of bread labeled "Simple problem." The classic case of computational overkill. Why use a simple if-statement when you could train a 500-layer neural network that requires a small power plant to run? Next week: using quantum computing to calculate a 15% tip.

Content 1997 2002 2012 2020 Always has been 3 Billion Devices Run Java 3 Billion wait, its all 3 billion devices? 3 Billion Devices Run 3 Billion Devices Run Java

Content Backend Frontend APIs Full-stack

The duality of every Windows developer's existence, captured in feline form. The top cat is in a food coma after consuming too many executable files—just like your PC when you've installed 47 different IDEs "just to try them out." Meanwhile, the bottom cat is already plotting its next compiler crime despite being absolutely stuffed with binaries. It's the digital equivalent of saying "I'm never drinking again" while simultaneously texting friends to plan next weekend's bar crawl. The eternal cycle of creating executables, regretting executables, then immediately creating more executables is basically the software development circle of life.

Content Mild LNSIOU 1000 AW SANd 1000 AN ARM MONA LINODI ARM MONA I

Oh the sweet, sweet irony! 😂 Remember when everyone was freaking out that ChatGPT would replace developers? Now we've got Deepseek coming for ChatGPT's throne! It's like watching AI cannibalism in real-time - the robots are eating each other before they even get to our jobs! The circle of tech life continues... today's disruptor becomes tomorrow's disrupted. Guess ChatGPT should update its resume and start practicing those interview questions! Even AI can't escape the relentless march of newer, shinier technology!