Recursive Puppy

Content I Am Devloper iamdevloper On the 7th day, the Lord rested. On the 8th day, the Lord awoke to several issues posted from the JavaScript community. 12:21 pm 14 Aug 17 v

Ah, the eternal C/C++ programmer's dream - a world where you don't have to choose between sizeof(array) and sizeof(array[0]) just to get the damn array length. Meanwhile, JavaScript devs are smugly using .length while we're over here doing division like it's 1972. The utopian future depicted isn't flying cars - it's sensible array APIs that don't decay into pointers the moment you sneeze on them. Ten thousand years of programming evolution and we're still manually calculating element counts like cavemen with abacuses.

Content Frontend developers picking color be like ProdrammerHumor.io

Content Using JS framework to not "reinvent the wheel" Using vanilla Js to implement a GUI that perfectly fits my customer's needs. ProgrammerHumor o

Content RECURSION IS JUST EANCY, WORSE GOTO WHAT? RECURSION IS USED TO JUMP TO THE START OF A FUNCTION'S EXECUTION BLOCK BREAKING CONTROL FLOW BUT IT ADDS TO THE CALL STACK AND IS EVEN HARDER TO UNDERSTAND. THEREFORE, WE SHOULD USE GOTO INSTEAD OF RECURSION JESSE WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? imoflip.com

The eternal frontend vs. backend war strikes again! Some backend developer clearly thought UI was just "JSON with line numbers" and called it a day. Instead of creating an actual interface with buttons and graphics, they've just dumped the raw data structure onto a smartwatch screen. It's literally just a JSON object with fitness stats displayed in code format - complete with syntax highlighting! The irony is delicious - right after claiming frontend is "useless," they've created the most programmer-friendly yet user-hostile interface imaginable. Only a true backend purist would think displaying raw key-value pairs is an acceptable UI. Next update: they'll probably add more brackets and semicolons to "enhance the user experience."