Scientists vs Programmers: The Miracle Of Working Code

The universal developer confession that hits way too close to home! That moment when you finally gather enough courage to reveal your spaghetti code to another human being, only to immediately undermine it with brutal honesty. The duality of programmer existence: spending hours writing code that barely functions, then sheepishly admitting it's a janky mess held together by Stack Overflow answers and pure luck. It's basically the software equivalent of "it's not much, but it's dishonest work."

The absolute HORROR of someone asking you to change your masterpiece! 😱 The sheer AUDACITY! Here we have Spider-Man (the experienced dev) telling his mini-me that his code is basically carved in stone tablets and brought down from Mount Sinai. "Permanent code" is the greatest myth since "temporary solutions" - it's just a dramatic way of saying "I wrote this spaghetti nightmare at 2am and I'm terrified to touch it again because THE WHOLE SYSTEM WILL COLLAPSE!" Let's be honest, we've all written that one feature where even WE don't remember how it works anymore. The boss dares to request a simple change and suddenly you're contemplating a career change to goat farming. 🐐

Content My team's intern just found a critical bug by shitposting in our codebase So our summer intern (who I'm 90 sure is a professional shitposter moonlighting as a dev) just saved our entire authentication service by being, well, an absolute agent of chaos. Background: We have this legacy auth system that's been running since before TikTok existed. No one touches it. It's documented in ancient Sanskrit and COBOL comments. The last guy who understood it fully left to become a yoga instructor in Peru. Enter our intern. First week, he asks why our commit messages are so boring. Starts adding memes to his. Whatever, right? Then he begins leaving comments in the codebase like: This function is older than me and probably pays taxes TODO: Ask if this while loop has health insurance Here lies Sarah's hopes and dreams (2019-2022), killed by this recursive call The senior devs were split between horrified and amused. But here's where it gets good. He's reading through the auth code (because "the commit messages here are too normal, sus") and adds this gem: yo why this token validation looking kinda thicc though fr fr no cap this base64 decode bussin wait... hold up... this ain't bussin at all Turns out his Gen Z spider-sense wasn't just tingling for the memes. Man actually found a validation bypass that's been lurking in our code since Obama's first term. The kind of bug that makes security auditors wake up in cold sweats. The best part? His Jira ticket title: "Auth be acting mad sus rn no cap frfr (Critical Security Issue)" The worst part? We now have to explain to the CEO why "no cap frfr" appears in our Q3 security audit report. The absolute kicker? Our senior security engineer's official code review comment: "bestie... you snapped with this find ng" I can't tell if this is the peak or rock bottom of our engineering culture. But I do know our intern's getting a return offer, if only because I need to see what he'll do to our GraphQL documentation.

Claude 4 just wrote the most elegant, useless code in history. 3,000+ lines of pristine architecture that does absolutely nothing except look pretty in the IDE. Like watching someone build a cathedral and then realizing they forgot to include doors. The digital equivalent of a perfectly organized sock drawer in a house that's on fire.

Behold, the evolution of a developer's brain slowly melting into absolute chaos! We start with the innocent x = 10 and somehow end up at a do-while loop that generates random numbers until the universe accidentally spits out 10. Because why use one line when you can gamble with the RNG gods and potentially loop until the heat death of the universe? The "Better" version adding ten ones together is giving strong "I get paid by lines of code" energy. The "Good" version with a backwards for loop that decrements from 0 is just... *chef's kiss* of unnecessary complexity. But the "Pro" move? That's weaponized inefficiency right there. Nothing screams senior developer quite like turning a constant assignment into a probability problem that could theoretically run forever. Your CPU will LOVE you!

Content python 85 0 Add a topic O Search a 11:16 AM joined python 11:22 AM Has anyone had difficulties with ibmiotf? I get an errormessage: "importerror: No module named ibmiotf". Suspect that it might be because of different paths, but haven't been able to solve it yet. 11:29 AM If you type python in the terminal and press tab a few times you should get a list of all Python installs you have. Try running them all to see which one you installed the module at I think virtual environments is a good idea when stuff like this happens 11:44 AM which tab should i press? You have more than one?