This Fitbit Clock Face

OH. MY. GOD. The BRUTAL truth about our toxic relationship with AI coding assistants! 💅 We're literally gambling our productivity away with these AI slot machines! Type a vague prompt, hit "Generate" and PRAY TO THE CODING GODS that you'll get something that doesn't make your compiler have an existential crisis! "Just one more prompt, I swear this will fix it!" - me, 47 prompts later, sobbing into my energy drink while my deadline approaches at the speed of light. Meanwhile, OpenAI is cackling all the way to the bank! The absolute AUDACITY of spending 3 hours prompting for something that would take 20 minutes to code yourself. But here we are, calling ourselves "prompt engineers" like we've invented a new profession instead of admitting we're just gambling addicts in developer hoodies! 💁‍♀️

Content Assert.sinstanceOf( mayonnaise, peof (Unstrument) TestMayonnaiselsInstrument: test failed Message: Assert.IsInstanceOfType failed. Expected type:linstrument. Actual type: Mayonnaise.

Content Developer Application Tester Application A Application on live server Security Researcher

The kid's "brute-force attack protection" is pure evil genius. While everyone's freaking out over his code, he's just sitting there with that smug little grin. His masterpiece? A login system that shows "Wrong login or password" even when the password is correct—but ONLY on the first attempt. It's basically digital psychological warfare. Every developer in that room just died inside imagining the hours of debugging hell this would cause. The coffee guy spitting out his drink is all of us realizing we'd probably format our entire machine before finding this little gem.

Asking "Is the server up?" and getting "Well, it was working yesterday but then Dave pushed some changes and now it's giving a 502 sometimes but only on Tuesdays" is the digital equivalent of asking if someone wants coffee and getting their life story. Boolean questions expect true/false answers, not a novel-length string that requires three scrolls and a therapist to process. The face says it all—that moment of silent suffering we all experience waiting for the simple "yes" or "no" that will never come.

Oh look, another tech prophet declaring our imminent obsolescence! The suggestion that we'll blindly trust AI-generated code like Claude without review is getting the Doge Bonk™ it deserves. Twenty years in this industry and I've survived every "this will replace programmers" prediction since Visual Basic. Sure, AI will change things, but the day we stop checking AI output is the day production servers spontaneously combust worldwide. Trust but verify isn't just for nuclear disarmament—it's for that sketchy code your AI buddy wrote while hallucinating documentation that doesn't exist.